Drawing a Y vs Time Graph in a projectile motion problem

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a Y vs. Time graph for a projectile motion problem involving a snowball rolling off a barn roof. Participants confirm the use of the correct formula, y = y0 + v0y*t - (1/2)*g*t^2, while addressing the need to input angles correctly in degrees or radians. There are challenges in obtaining specific Y coordinates for plotting, with some users experiencing issues with the online assignment system not recognizing correct answers. Ultimately, the consensus is that understanding the mechanics of the problem is more important than the exact points for the homework. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate calculations and troubleshooting in physics problems.
Arejang
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Drawing a Y vs Time Graph in a projectile motion problem

Homework Statement


A snowball rolls off a barn roof that slopes downward at an angle of 40 degrees. The edge of the roof is 14.0m above the ground, and the snowball has a speed of 7.00 m/s as it rolls off the roof. Ignore air resistance.

Draw y-t graphs for the motion in part A.

Homework Equations



y=(Vo*sin(alpha))*t-1/2*g*t^2

(In this problem alpha is 40)

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried inserting various time intervals (i.e. .1 sec; .2 sec; .3 sec; etc) to the equation above (I assumed that y= the distance fallen from 14m at the specific time t). So the resultant y I calculated, I subtracted from 14m to get the resultant y coordinate at time t. This being an online assignment, requires exact (y,t) coordinates starting from 0 seconds-1.3 seconds having 0.1 second increments in between. The y coordinates are also specific to 0.1 m increments ranging from 0.0 meters to 14.0 meters. Any possible help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump. Please tell me if I'm doing the right thing and using the correct formula. Or if I have to try a different approach or the formula is incorrectly used.
 
y = y0 + v0y*t - (1/2)*g*t^2

If you consider your referential center at the floor: y0 = 14, the graph is going to decrease from y = 14 to y = 0.
If you consider your referential center at the edge of the roof: y0 = 0, the graph is going to decrease from y = 0 to y = -14.
You only need to iterate through t, and find y:)
 
yes, and since y is affected by gravity. the graph from y=14 should travel down in a quadratic fashion. So it should look like part of a parabola that opens downward. My only problem is finding specific Y points to plot in the graph.

If I plug in numbers for t in the equation you used, I should be able to get the correct coords for each y component right? I did this and still the answer wasn't recognized as correct.
 
Humm did you notice that v0y is negative in this case right?
 
Yes, I used 14-7*sin40*t-1/2*9.8*t^2.

This still was not the desired answer.
 
Last edited:
This is the resultant graph I had from doing the calculations using the above mentioned formula using a negative velocity. Since we are dealing with trig functions, I made sure that the calculations were done in degrees. It does give a function that somewhat resembles a parabola but it's still not the desired answer. If anyone can help, I'd really appreciate it! :)
 

Attachments

  • Graph.JPG
    Graph.JPG
    8.9 KB · Views: 2,183
Bump! Please can anyone help? If you think this should be the correct answer, tell me that it is so i can at least report that the answer wasn't correctly input for the question.
 
hmmm the formula is right, but are you sure that sin function receives the input in degrees?
Because i used the a sin function that receives the value of the angle in radians and gave it a input in degrees and the graph result is almost the same.
At t=1,2s gives me 1,544584079m.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
yeah, it turns out that the online program was bugged and wouldn't accept any answer whatsoever. ha ha. But so long as the equation was right, that's all I care for. The points for the homework aren't as important to me as knowing the actual mechanic of the problem itself. So thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K