MHB Drawing and finding the value of postfix expression

yakin
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
View attachment 2472
View attachment 2473

I am ending with no operator in the end. So 1000 160 would be the answer or what. I do not know what to do from here. Please help!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    11.5 KB · Views: 107
  • 20140511_213927.jpg
    20140511_213927.jpg
    53.3 KB · Views: 106
Physics news on Phys.org
yakin said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/2472
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/2473

I am ending with no operator in the end. So 1000 160 would be the answer or what. I do not know what to do from here. Please help!
Yes you end up short one operator, so you have nodes containing 1000 and 160 with no operator to join them.
 
DavidCampen said:
Yes you end up short one operator, so you have nodes containing 1000 and 160 with no operator to join them.
So 1000 and 160 is the answer. And did I draw the Binary Tree right?
 
yakin said:
So 1000 and 160 is the answer. And did I draw the Binary Tree right?

Yes and yes.
 

Thread 'Roulette wheel physics and probability'

Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
View full post »
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'

Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'

The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
View full post »

Similar threads

I Can you calculate the probability of a complex logic expression?
Replies
3
Views
1K
B Baccarat math and beating the edge
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Proper understanding of p-value
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Irish lottery record 54-draw rollover, new legislation....
Replies
25
Views
2K
MHB Draw a NAND-gate to get that output
Replies
16
Views
2K
A Confused about magnitude of error
Replies
18
Views
3K
I Does Returning Marbles After Each Draw Affect Chi-square Test Results?
Replies
8
Views
2K
A Low value standard deviation bias
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Odds of Drawing Sequence 4457: Calculating Probability
Replies
8
Views
2K
A Combining model uncertainties with analytical uncertainties
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top