Driven Damped Harmonic Oscillator Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the driven damped harmonic oscillator problem, specifically analyzing the differential equation m \ddot{x} + 3 \beta m \dot{x} + \frac{17}{2} \beta^2 m x = m A \cos{\omega t}. The solution reveals that the frequency for steady-state oscillations is \omega_r = 2 \beta, leading to a maximum amplitude of A_2(\omega_r) = \frac{2 A}{15 \beta^2}. The analysis employs Euler's identity and involves calculating derivatives to find the optimal frequency and amplitude.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, particularly second-order linear equations.
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and Euler's identity.
  • Knowledge of harmonic motion and oscillatory systems.
  • Basic calculus, specifically differentiation and optimization techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of solutions for second-order linear differential equations.
  • Learn about the application of Euler's identity in solving oscillatory problems.
  • Explore the concept of damping in oscillators and its effects on amplitude and frequency.
  • Investigate the physical implications of driven damped harmonic oscillators in real-world systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory systems, as well as engineers working with dynamic systems and control theory.

Walczyk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A mass m moves along the x-axis subject to an attractive force given by [tex]\frac {17} {2} \beta^2 m x[/tex] and a retarding force given by [tex]3 \beta m \dot{x}[/tex], where [tex]x[/tex] is its distance from the origin and [tex]\beta[/tex] is a constant. A driving force given by [tex]m A \cos{\omega t}[/tex] where [tex]A[/tex] is a constant, is applied to the particle along the x-axis. What value of [tex]\omega[/tex] results in steady-state oscillations about the origin with maximum amplitude? What is the maximum amplitude?

Here's what I've done:

This is the differential equation I've come up with:
[tex]m \ddot{x} + 3 \beta m \dot{x} + \frac{17}{2} \beta^2 m x = m A \cos{\omega t}[/tex]

I'm pretty sure these two steps are the correct ones to make, my textbooks uses this approach:
[tex]A \cos{\omega t} = A e^{i \omega t}[/tex]

[tex]x(t) = A_2 e^{i(\omega t - \theta)[/tex]

This is what I got after plugging in x(t) and solving the derivitives, and dropping the m term:
[tex]-A_2 \omega^2 e^{i(\omega t - \theta)} + A_2 3 i \beta \omega e^{i(\omega t - \theta)} + A_2 e^{i(\omega t - \theta)} = A e^{i \omega t}[/tex]

This is after I eliminated [tex]e^{i \omega t}[/tex] and moved [tex]e^{-i \theta}[/tex]:
[tex]A_2(\frac {17} {2} \beta^2 - \omega^2 + 3 i \beta \omega) = A e^{i \theta}[/tex]

These are the equations I got after applying Euler's identity:
[tex]A_2(\frac {17} {2} \beta^2 - \omega^2) = A \cos{\theta}[/tex]

[tex]A_2 3 \beta \omega = A \sin{\theta}[/tex]

I divided one equation by the other for [tex]\theta[/tex]:
[tex]tan{\theta} = \frac {3 \beta \omega} {\frac {17} {2} \beta^2 - \omega^2}[/tex]

I squared and added both equation's then solved for [tex]A^2_2[/tex]:
[tex]A^2_2 = \frac {A^2} {\omega^4 - 8 \beta^2 \omega^2 + \frac {289} {4} \beta^4}[/tex]

edit: I solved it on my own. Thanks for nothing!
Taking the derivative of the last equation with respect to [tex]\omega[/tex]:
[tex]A'_2(\omega) = A \omega (\omega^4 - 8 \beta \omega + \frac {289} {4} \beta^4)^{-3/2} (8 \beta^2 - 2 \omega^2)[/tex]

Setting [tex]A'_2 = 0[/tex] and recognizing that [tex]\omega = 0[/tex] is an arbitrary solution [tex]8 \beta^2 - 2 \omega^2 = 0[/tex].
Therefore [tex]\omega_r = 2 \beta[/tex].

For the second part of the problem I plug [tex]\omega_r[/tex] into [tex]A_2(\omega)[/tex]:
[tex]A_2(\omega_r) = A(\frac {225} {4} \beta^4)^{\frac {-1} {2}}[/tex]

The final result!:
[tex]A_2(\omega_r) = \frac {2 A} {15 \beta^2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
drop the m in the RHS. Why did you use it? Also an atrctive force must be negative if you have it on the LHS.

the question implies it's an oscillator (under damped) this will only be true if beta is < 0.

Furthermore, the m's in the forces ar curious.

Since you solved it - I would necessarily check it to find why my suggestions appear invalid.
 
The OP hasn't logged in since more than 4 years, so do not expect a reply from his part.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K