Driven Quantum harmonic oscillator by way of the S-Matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the vacuum expectation value of the time-ordered product of position operators in a driven quantum harmonic oscillator using the S-matrix approach. The Lagrangian provided includes a driving force f(t) and leads to the integral D, which is crucial for the S-matrix expansion. Participants analyze the vacuum expectation value <0|T x(t)x(t')|0> and its dependence on time ordering, noting the importance of considering both t > t' and t < t'. The conversation highlights the necessity of incorporating absolute values and epsilon terms in the integrals to ensure convergence and obtain the correct results. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the subtleties involved in the calculations and the adjustments needed to arrive at the desired expression in frequency space.
Henriamaa
Messages
14
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


We have the lagragian L = \frac{m}{2} \dot{x}^2 - \frac{m \omega x^2}{2} + f(t) x(t)
where f(t) = f_0 for 0 \le t \le T 0 otherwise. The only diagram that survives in the s -matrix expansion when calculating <0|S|0> is D = \int dt dt&#039; f(t)f(t&#039;) &lt;0|T x(t)x(t&#039;)|0&gt;. (This is easily seen by looking at the magnus expansion with interacting hamiltonian in the interaction picture being f(t)x(t)). Show that in frequency space D = \int d\nu \frac{-1}{4m \pi} f(-\nu) \frac{i}{\nu^2 - \omega^2 + i \epsilon} f(\nu)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


&lt;0| T x(t)x(t&#039;)|0&gt; = \frac{1}{2m\omega}e^{i(t-t&#039;)\omega}
where x(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\omega}}(a e^{-i\omega t}+ a^{\dagger}e^{i\omega t} ). I got the result by applying wick's theorem. I assumed that t > t' and merely calculated &lt;0| [a e^{-i \omega t}, a^{\dagger}e^{i \omega t&#039;}] |0&gt; \frac{1}{2m \omega}. Now putting in all the Fourier expressions D = \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \int dt dt&#039; d\nu d\nu&#039; f(\nu) e^{-i\nu t}\frac{1}{2m\omega}e^{i(t-t&#039;)\omega} e^{-i \nu&#039; t&#039; }f(\nu&#039;) . There is no need of going on because integrating out t and t' merely gives delta functions which will not give the result. The only place where I can see I have gone wrong is in calculating the VEV but then I do not know what I am doing wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Henriamaa said:
&lt;0| T x(t)x(t&#039;)|0&gt; = \frac{1}{2m\omega}e^{i(t-t&#039;)\omega}
where x(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\omega}}(a e^{-i\omega t}+ a^{\dagger}e^{i\omega t} ). I got the result by applying wick's theorem. I assumed that t > t' and merely calculated &lt;0| [a e^{-i \omega t}, a^{\dagger}e^{i \omega t&#039;}] |0&gt; \frac{1}{2m \omega}.

Since we have a time ordered product, we also have to consider ##t<t'##, so you should find that
$$\langle 0| T( x(t)x(t') )|0\rangle \propto e^{i\omega|t-t'|}.$$
The absolute value has consequences below.

Now putting in all the Fourier expressions D = \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \int dt dt&#039; d\nu d\nu&#039; f(\nu) e^{-i\nu t}\frac{1}{2m\omega}e^{i(t-t&#039;)\omega} e^{-i \nu&#039; t&#039; }f(\nu&#039;) . There is no need of going on because integrating out t and t' merely gives delta functions which will not give the result. The only place where I can see I have gone wrong is in calculating the VEV but then I do not know what I am doing wrong.

When you include the absolute value, we have different expressions for ##t <t'## and ##t> t'##. One way to account for this is to split the integrals
$$ \int dt dt' e^{i\omega|t-t'| - i \nu t -i \nu' t' } = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dt \left[ e^{i(\omega-\nu)t } \int_{-\infty}^t e^{-i(\omega +\nu' + i\epsilon) t'} + e^{-i(\omega+\nu)t }\int^{\infty}_t e^{i(\omega -\nu' + i\epsilon) t'}\right],$$
where the ##i\epsilon##s have been added to make the ##t'## integrals converge. If you follow along the calculation, you should be able to reproduce the denominator from the suggested result.
 
Thanks for the reply, the absolute value does accomplish the trick with the slight modification that I ignored the epsilons in the exponential when I did the integrals over t, otherwise I could not get the delta functions that I know I need.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K