Dynamic vs kinetic vs static in physics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the terms dynamic, kinetic, and static in the context of physics. The original poster seeks to understand how these concepts are compared and defined within the field.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore definitions and comparisons of dynamic, kinetic, and static, with some expressing uncertainty about the reliability of sources like Wikipedia for scientific information.

Discussion Status

Participants are sharing their perspectives on the reliability of various sources for understanding the terms in question. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Wikipedia and other resources for further research, though there is no explicit consensus on the definitions themselves.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions prior hesitance to ask questions in other forums due to concerns about the significance of their inquiries. There is an underlying tension regarding the appropriateness of the question within the forum's context.

shushi_boi
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question, just a simple physics question which I decided to ask here. I held off from asking in the other general physics forum because I get accused of asking random questions that are insignificant. I really want to understand these terms and how they are compared in physics. I understand that dynamic is work done as intended and static is the opposite I think.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shushi_boi said:
I held off from asking in the other general physics forum because I get accused of asking random questions that are insignificant. I really want to understand these terms and how they are compared in physics.


So why not do some of your own research? The Wikipedia articles on the three topics you mention define them well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinematics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamics_(mechanics )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statics

PF is great for asking about specific details, it's not designed as a primary source of information.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I got this all from my textbook, in mechanics and systems, but I did not know that wikipedia was a reliable scientific source for scientific knowledge. I appreciate your response billy, thank you for posting!
 
I probably wouldn't cite it for anything, but I've never been lead astray via wikipedia. ~99.9% of their stuff is cited with scholarly or other respectable sources and clicking the little number after a statement will take you to the link for the info. I use it frequently when I want some quick fast info. That and hyperphysics, the only problem with hyper is sometimes I feel like they don't go into enough detail. I haven't run into that issue on wiki.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
854
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K