Dynamical Systems - Chaos: Stability condition for a 2-cycle system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the stability conditions for a 2-cycle system defined by the equation x_{n + 1} = F(x_n) = \lambda (1 - \alpha x_n^2). The key findings include the conditions for the existence of a 2-cycle, which requires 2 \lambda^2 - 3 > 0 leading to \lambda > \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}, and the stability condition defined by |F'(x)| < 1, resulting in the interval - \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} < \lambda < \sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the derivatives of the function and their implications for stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dynamical systems and 2-cycle behavior
  • Familiarity with fixed points and stability analysis
  • Knowledge of derivatives and the chain rule in calculus
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of fixed points in dynamical systems
  • Learn about stability conditions in nonlinear systems
  • Explore the application of the chain rule in stability analysis
  • Investigate the implications of parameter variations in dynamical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics, particularly those focusing on dynamical systems, chaos theory, and stability analysis. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of 2-cycle systems and their stability conditions.

Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
Homework Statement
Find the values of the parameter ##\lambda## such that the 2-cycle is stable
Relevant Equations
None
Hi,

(This question is part of the same example as a previous post of mine, but I have a question about a different part of it)

I was looking at a question from an exam for a course I am self-teaching. There is a sub-question which asks us to find the values of a parameter for which the 2-cycle system is stable. However, when looking at the solution I don't understand the condition they have used (and I can't see any reference to it in the materials I am using).

Question & Attempt:
Let us imagine we have a system: ## x_{n + 1} = F(x_n) = \lambda ( 1 - \alpha x_n ^2) ##. Then there are some sub-questions about finding the 2-cycle system and the fixed points of it, before the parts I specifically I don't understand.

(i) Find the 2-cycle system
We can do this by doing ## F(F(x_n)) = \lambda - \alpha \lambda ^3 - 2 \alpha ^2 \lambda ^3 x^2 - \alpha ^3 \lambda ^3 x ^4 ##

(ii) Then we find the fixed points of the 2-cycle system
Then we look for the fixed points by setting ## F(F(x)) = x ## which results in the following:
(\lambda - \alpha \lambda x^2 - x) (1 - \alpha x \lambda - \alpha \lambda ^2 + \alpha ^2 x^2 \lambda ^2) = 0

Then the second term is the condition for ##F(F(x)) = x ##, which I thought was also a fixed point.

This leads to two solutions:
\hat x_{1, 2} = \frac{\alpha \lambda \pm \alpha \lambda \sqrt{ 4 \alpha \lambda ^2 - 3}}{2 \alpha ^2 \lambda ^2}

We are told to use ## \alpha = \frac{1}{2} ## from here onwards.
Thus the solutions reduce to: ## \hat x_{1, 2} = \frac{1}{\lambda} \left( 1 \pm \sqrt{ 2 \lambda ^2 - 3} \right) ##

Below are the parts I don't understand the theory for:
(iii) Find the values of ##\lambda## for which the 2-cycle exists (subject of previous question)

The solution exists when ## 2 \lambda ^2 - 3 > 0 \rightarrow \lambda > \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} ##

(iv) Find the values of ## \lambda ## for which the 2-cycle is stable

The solution scheme says that we do:
\left| \frac{dF(F(x))}{dx} |_{\hat x_{1, 2}} \right| = \left| F&#039;(\hat x_1) F&#039;(\hat x_2) \right| &lt; 1


and then it arrives at the answer: ## -\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} < \lambda < \sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} ##

I am not sure where this condition comes from... Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(iii): The fixed points of F \circ F must be real for a 2-cycle to exist.

(iv): Which do you not understand: why |f&#039;(x)| &lt; 1 is the condition for x_{n+1} = f(x_n) to be stable, or why the chain rule gives (F \circ F)&#039;(x_1) = (F \circ F)&#039;(x_2) = F&#039;(x_1)F&#039;(x_2)?
 
Thanks @pasmith !

pasmith said:
(iii): The fixed points of F \circ F must be real for a 2-cycle to exist.
Sure thing!

pasmith said:
(iv): Which do you not understand: why |f&#039;(x)| &lt; 1 is the condition for x_{n+1} = f(x_n) to be stable, or why the chain rule gives (F \circ F)&#039;(x_1) = (F \circ F)&#039;(x_2) = F&#039;(x_1)F&#039;(x_2)?
Neither unfortunately.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K