Dynamical Systems - Chaos: Stability condition for a 2-cycle system

Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
Homework Statement
Find the values of the parameter ##\lambda## such that the 2-cycle is stable
Relevant Equations
None
Hi,

(This question is part of the same example as a previous post of mine, but I have a question about a different part of it)

I was looking at a question from an exam for a course I am self-teaching. There is a sub-question which asks us to find the values of a parameter for which the 2-cycle system is stable. However, when looking at the solution I don't understand the condition they have used (and I can't see any reference to it in the materials I am using).

Question & Attempt:
Let us imagine we have a system: ## x_{n + 1} = F(x_n) = \lambda ( 1 - \alpha x_n ^2) ##. Then there are some sub-questions about finding the 2-cycle system and the fixed points of it, before the parts I specifically I don't understand.

(i) Find the 2-cycle system
We can do this by doing ## F(F(x_n)) = \lambda - \alpha \lambda ^3 - 2 \alpha ^2 \lambda ^3 x^2 - \alpha ^3 \lambda ^3 x ^4 ##

(ii) Then we find the fixed points of the 2-cycle system
Then we look for the fixed points by setting ## F(F(x)) = x ## which results in the following:
(\lambda - \alpha \lambda x^2 - x) (1 - \alpha x \lambda - \alpha \lambda ^2 + \alpha ^2 x^2 \lambda ^2) = 0

Then the second term is the condition for ##F(F(x)) = x ##, which I thought was also a fixed point.

This leads to two solutions:
\hat x_{1, 2} = \frac{\alpha \lambda \pm \alpha \lambda \sqrt{ 4 \alpha \lambda ^2 - 3}}{2 \alpha ^2 \lambda ^2}

We are told to use ## \alpha = \frac{1}{2} ## from here onwards.
Thus the solutions reduce to: ## \hat x_{1, 2} = \frac{1}{\lambda} \left( 1 \pm \sqrt{ 2 \lambda ^2 - 3} \right) ##

Below are the parts I don't understand the theory for:
(iii) Find the values of ##\lambda## for which the 2-cycle exists (subject of previous question)

The solution exists when ## 2 \lambda ^2 - 3 > 0 \rightarrow \lambda > \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} ##

(iv) Find the values of ## \lambda ## for which the 2-cycle is stable

The solution scheme says that we do:
\left| \frac{dF(F(x))}{dx} |_{\hat x_{1, 2}} \right| = \left| F'(\hat x_1) F'(\hat x_2) \right| < 1


and then it arrives at the answer: ## -\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} < \lambda < \sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} ##

I am not sure where this condition comes from... Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(iii): The fixed points of F \circ F must be real for a 2-cycle to exist.

(iv): Which do you not understand: why |f&#039;(x)| &lt; 1 is the condition for x_{n+1} = f(x_n) to be stable, or why the chain rule gives (F \circ F)&#039;(x_1) = (F \circ F)&#039;(x_2) = F&#039;(x_1)F&#039;(x_2)?
 
Thanks @pasmith !

pasmith said:
(iii): The fixed points of F \circ F must be real for a 2-cycle to exist.
Sure thing!

pasmith said:
(iv): Which do you not understand: why |f&#039;(x)| &lt; 1 is the condition for x_{n+1} = f(x_n) to be stable, or why the chain rule gives (F \circ F)&#039;(x_1) = (F \circ F)&#039;(x_2) = F&#039;(x_1)F&#039;(x_2)?
Neither unfortunately.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top