E field distribution in spark discharge

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the estimation of the dielectric constant and loss tangent of air plasma during an audio frequency electric discharge in a spark plug, specifically at 35 kHz. Participants explore the relationship between electric field distribution, current, and voltage measurements obtained from an oscilloscope, as well as the implications for modeling plasma behavior in simulations using Ansys HFSS software.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Florin seeks to understand how to estimate the dielectric constant and loss tangent of air plasma from oscilloscope data during a spark discharge.
  • Jano provides a reference to a paper that may contain relevant information on potential fields in gas discharges.
  • Eman suggests that the dielectric constant could be related to the rate of change of current and voltage, likening the spark plug to a low-value air-dielectric capacitor.
  • Florin proposes an alternative approach using plasma conductivity to estimate the dielectric constant based on maximum electric field and current measurements.
  • Florin seeks clarification on the formula relating dielectric constant to current and voltage changes, indicating uncertainty about the best method to calculate it.
  • Another participant comments on the classification of the frequency, noting that 35 kHz is considered ultrasonic rather than audio frequency.
  • Florin expresses interest in understanding complex permittivity and its implications for modeling discharge gaps as resistor/capacitor systems.
  • A later reply provides a link to a resource that includes an equation relating current to capacitance and voltage change, which may assist in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to estimate the dielectric constant and loss tangent, with multiple approaches and uncertainties expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding the geometry of the spark plug and the nature of the electric discharge, as well as the complexity of modeling plasma behavior, which remains unresolved.

fnsaceleanu
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just joined this forums.
I'm currently doing my master thesis in mechanical engineering, however, my topic is related to plasma physics.
As part of my results, I need to simulate an audio frequency electric discharge in a spark plug in air, in Ansys HFSS software.

The discharge is at 35 kHz, and an oscilloscope obtains the voltage between electrode and ground plate, and current through the ground plate, every nanosecond.

Is this info enough to estimate the dielectric constant and loss tangent of the air plasma, every nanosecond?
I'm interested to know how the electric field varies in space, from the data obtained through the oscilloscope.

Any help/suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks!

Florin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot answer your question, but I found this paper:

Phys. Rev. 83,3 (1951)

1951 Finkelburg Segal The Potential Field in and around a Gas Discharge

Jano
 
Florin,
I'm not really qualified to answer this, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt. That said:
Dielectric constant should be related to the rate of change of current and voltage between electrode and ground plate prior to the arc discharge. At that point I think the spark plug would be acting as a very low-value air-dielectric capacitor. If you know how fast this "capacitor" charges given a particular applied voltage, and you know the dimensions of the "capacitor" (the size of the electrode and ground plate, and distance between them) you should be able to determine the dielectric constant.

I don't know what a loss tangent is, so I can't help you there...
 
Thanks for the link Jano.

and Eman, could you show me the formula that relates the dielectric constant to the rate of change of current and potential between electrode and ground? (I have the current rate of change and potential difference)

I went another way around it, and assumed that plasma conductivity, omega, (E field divided by curreny density J) is simply maximum E field divided by maximum measured current through the wire. Then I found the dielectric constant from conductivity value and the AC frequency.

But as you said, there's probably a better way to calculate that.
Thanks!
 
Ok, I can see how to relate the permittivity to the rate of change of voltage and current.. formula for a capacitor, where the capacitance is a function of the permittivity and geometry.
Is this what you meant?

Also, the loss tangent is the angle between the real permittivity and its imaginary part.
In plasmas, the permittivity has an imaginary part that is related to absorption/reflection of the electromagnetic waves.

So now the question is how to use this complex permittivity... I'm guessing that's why discharge gaps are modeled as resistor/capacitor, so you have a real and a fluctuating loss.
 
Just a comment: conventionally the audio frequency range is from 20 Hz to 20 kHz. 35kHz would be “ultrasonic” because we humans cannot hear it.
 
fnsaceleanu said:
Thanks for the link Jano.

and Eman, could you show me the formula that relates the dielectric constant to the rate of change of current and potential between electrode and ground? (I have the current rate of change and potential difference)

I'm not really sure what you're asking, nor am I really sure I'm the person to give you a definitive answer... but this seems like it might help:

http://www.avx.com/docs/Catalogs/cbasic.pdf

Equation III relates the current to the capacitance and dV/dt, and capacitance contains the dielectric constant.

This discussion also seems relevant:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=145203
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K