E-field of a Semi-spherical charge distribution with a hole

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric field at a specific point due to a semi-spherical charge distribution with a spherical hole. The charge distribution has a constant density and is defined in a three-dimensional space with specified coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration limits for the electric field calculation, particularly questioning the choice of the lower limit for the radial integral. There is a suggestion to reconsider the integration approach, including the possibility of using a power series expansion instead of direct integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem setup and integration limits. Some have proposed alternative methods and expressed curiosity about the challenges of direct integration, while others have shared insights on the implications of the spherical hole in the charge distribution.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a divergence in the results obtained through direct integration, which raises questions about the appropriateness of this method for the problem. The original poster notes that the problem may not be commonly found in textbooks, indicating its complexity.

sergioro
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using direct integration, compute the electric field at the point (0,0,Z) of a semi-espherical (z > 0) charge distribution of radius R < Z and density ##\rho=constant## having a spherical hole of radius ##r_h<R## centered at (0,0,##r_h##).

Homework Equations



Coulomb's law in differential form:
## d\vec{E} = \frac{Kdq}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}_{dq}|^2}\frac{\vec{r} - \vec{r}_{dq}}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}_{dq}|}##

##\vec{r} = Z \hat{k} ## (the field point)

##\vec{r}_{dq} = r\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)\hat{\imath} + r\sin(\theta)\sin(\phi)\hat{\jmath} + r\cos(\theta)\hat{k}## (the source point)

## r = 2r_h\cos(\theta) ## (the spherical hole in spherical coordinates )

The Attempt at a Solution



By symmetry, the only relevant integral is:

## \vec{E}(z) = 2\pi K \rho \int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=\pi/2} d\theta \int_{r=2 r_h \cos{\theta}}^{r=R} dr \left[ \frac{ Z-r\cos(\theta) }{ (r^2 - 2 r Z \cos(\theta) + Z^2)^{3/2} } \right]r^2 \sin(\theta) ##

The question is how to perform the integral. Using brute force via the wolfram alpha site
finished with Standard computation time exceeded...

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/...,+{r,+2*rh*Cos[theta],+R}],+{theta,+0,+Pi/2}]

Thanks in advance for your help,

Sergio
PS. By the way, the formulation seems to be right as one can get the right ##\vec{E}## field of the full semi-sphere
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wonder about the lower limit of ##dr##. Why not simply ##r_h## ?
 
It is not a fix lower limit. It is a spherical hole.
 
But surely all points on the surface of a spherical hole that is centered at ##(0,0,r_h) ## are at a distance ##r_h## away from the origin ?
 
BvU said:
But surely all points on the surface of a spherical hole that is centered at ##(0,0,r_h) ## are at a distance ##r_h## away from the origin ?

Yes, but the charge source vector is not measure respect the hole. The picture attached "might" help to make clear the narrative of the problem.

I found the solution via power expansion. Nevertheless, I am still curios on why direct integration does not seem to work here (there is a divergence in the result due to a logarithm term, that in spite the integrand behaves well in the region of integration).
This might be the reason why textbooks does not have this neither as a solved problem nor as proposed one. It is a very rich problem to ilustrate vectors, integration that does not seems to work (or are very difficult) and solution via power series.

Perhaps changing the origin to be at the center of the hole could make the integration less hard, but the asymmetry it generates does not seem to support that.Sergio
charge_distribution.png
 
O, I see o:)o:)o:), pretty dumb of me, sorry. I take it the picture came with the exercise ?
By now I understand relevant equations 1,2,3 And I think I understand ##
r = 2r_h\cos(\theta)## as the lower bound of ##r##.
I know it says 'by direct integration', but does that exclude an integration over a charged half-sphere (which you apparently have already) minus an integration over the ##r_h## sphere with opposite charge density (which indeed is easier with the origin at ##(0,0,r_h)## ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K