E&M proof for a integralnot sure whats it called

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brown Arrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Proof
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
Brown Arrow
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Δ<--- the gradient X<---cross product
(o∫) closed integral

∫((ΔT)Xda = (o∫)-Tdl

btw what is the realtion ship above called?

Homework Equations


da= axdydz +aydxdz +azdxdy
dl=axdx + aydy + azdy

The Attempt at a Solution


not sure where to go on from here :/ I am kinda lost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Brown Arrow! :smile:

(have a del: ∇ and an integral: ∫ :wink:)
Brown Arrow said:
btw what is the realtion ship above called?

Stokes' theorem! (or Kelvin-Stokes theorem, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes'_theorem#Kelvin.E2.80.93Stokes_theorem" :wink:)
da= axdydz +aydxdz +azdxdy
dl=axdx + aydy + azdy

The Attempt at a Solution


not sure where to go on from here :/ I am kinda lost

I don't understand what the question is. :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From what I can make out of the question you are supposed to prove that

[tex]\int \nabla T \times d\bold a = \oint T d\bold I[/tex]

where [tex]d\bold a = (dydz,dxdz,dxdy) , d\bold I=(dx,dy,dz)[/tex]

Am I right
 
yes, I am not sure how to go about it.
I am suppose to show that both of them are equal to each other
[tex] \int \nabla T \times d\bold a = - \oint T d\bold I[/tex]
 
its a bit tedious if you don't use the Levi-Civita tensor, but letting dxdy=-dydx (I know it's a bit weird but it's the only way this thing works) the LHS =

[tex]\int \int \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{ijk} \epsilon_{klm} \partial_{j} T dx^l dx^m[/tex]

[tex]= \int \int \frac{1}{2} (\delta_{il} \delta_{jm} - \delta_{im} \delta_{jl}) \partial_{j} T dx^l dx^m[/tex]

[tex]= \int \int \frac{1}{2} (\partial_{m} T dx^i dx^m - \partial_{l} T dx^l dx^i)[/tex]

[tex]= \int \int \frac{1}{2} (-\partial_{m} T dx^m dx^i - \partial_{l} T dx^l dx^i) = - \oint T dx^i[/tex]

where we used the contracted epsilon identity and changed the last integral into a closed one because going from integrating with respect to an area to a line integral the boundaries change so that the integral becomes closed

Anyway hope this helped the way to do it using standard vector operations is to rewrite [tex]d\bold a = (dydz,dxdz,dxdy)[/tex] as [tex]d\bold a = \frac{1}{2} (dydz -dzdy,dxdz-dzdx,dxdy-dydx)[/tex] which makes sense because the area between two vectors is [tex]\left|\bold a \times \bold b \right|[/tex]
 
Last edited:
thanks for the help, but i have not learned it the way you have shown above so its really hard for me to understand it. :/

is there a simpler way?
 
well do you know what the cross product between two vectors is