E&M proof for a integralnot sure whats it called

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brown Arrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship involving integrals and vector calculus, specifically focusing on the gradient and cross product in the context of electromagnetism. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the notation and the theorem related to the integral expressions presented.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the integrals involving the gradient and cross product, with references to Stokes' theorem. There are attempts to clarify the expressions and their meanings, as well as questions about the original poster's understanding of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the mathematical relationships and theorems involved, while others express uncertainty about the original poster's question and seek clarification. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster may not be familiar with certain mathematical concepts, such as the Levi-Civita tensor or the cross product, which could affect their understanding of the discussion. There is also mention of the complexity of the problem and the need for simpler explanations.

Brown Arrow
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Δ<--- the gradient X<---cross product
(o∫) closed integral

∫((ΔT)Xda = (o∫)-Tdl

btw what is the realtion ship above called?

Homework Equations


da= axdydz +aydxdz +azdxdy
dl=axdx + aydy + azdy

The Attempt at a Solution


not sure where to go on from here :/ I am kinda lost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Brown Arrow! :smile:

(have a del: ∇ and an integral: ∫ :wink:)
Brown Arrow said:
btw what is the realtion ship above called?

Stokes' theorem! (or Kelvin-Stokes theorem, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes'_theorem#Kelvin.E2.80.93Stokes_theorem" :wink:)
da= axdydz +aydxdz +azdxdy
dl=axdx + aydy + azdy

The Attempt at a Solution


not sure where to go on from here :/ I am kinda lost

I don't understand what the question is. :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From what I can make out of the question you are supposed to prove that

[tex]\int \nabla T \times d\bold a = \oint T d\bold I[/tex]

where [tex]d\bold a = (dydz,dxdz,dxdy) , d\bold I=(dx,dy,dz)[/tex]

Am I right
 
yes, I am not sure how to go about it.
I am suppose to show that both of them are equal to each other
[tex] \int \nabla T \times d\bold a = - \oint T d\bold I[/tex]
 
its a bit tedious if you don't use the Levi-Civita tensor, but letting dxdy=-dydx (I know it's a bit weird but it's the only way this thing works) the LHS =

[tex]\int \int \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{ijk} \epsilon_{klm} \partial_{j} T dx^l dx^m[/tex]

[tex]= \int \int \frac{1}{2} (\delta_{il} \delta_{jm} - \delta_{im} \delta_{jl}) \partial_{j} T dx^l dx^m[/tex]

[tex]= \int \int \frac{1}{2} (\partial_{m} T dx^i dx^m - \partial_{l} T dx^l dx^i)[/tex]

[tex]= \int \int \frac{1}{2} (-\partial_{m} T dx^m dx^i - \partial_{l} T dx^l dx^i) = - \oint T dx^i[/tex]

where we used the contracted epsilon identity and changed the last integral into a closed one because going from integrating with respect to an area to a line integral the boundaries change so that the integral becomes closed

Anyway hope this helped the way to do it using standard vector operations is to rewrite [tex]d\bold a = (dydz,dxdz,dxdy)[/tex] as [tex]d\bold a = \frac{1}{2} (dydz -dzdy,dxdz-dzdx,dxdy-dydx)[/tex] which makes sense because the area between two vectors is [tex]\left|\bold a \times \bold b \right|[/tex]
 
Last edited:
thanks for the help, but i have not learned it the way you have shown above so its really hard for me to understand it. :/

is there a simpler way?
 
well do you know what the cross product between two vectors is
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K