Earth Rope Challenge: 6m Longer - How High?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter topsquark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Sort
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a rope tied around the Earth, which is then cut and extended by 6 meters. Participants explore the implications of this extension on the height of the rope above the Earth's surface, considering different assumptions about the Earth's radius and alternative configurations of the rope.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the initial problem, suggesting it has a surprising answer and invites others to respond.
  • Another participant recalls a similar problem from car forums, indicating a history of disbelief and debate surrounding the solution.
  • A participant challenges the assumption of using the Earth's mean radius (6,371 km), noting the variations in equatorial and polar radii and suggesting that the answer depends on the chosen radius.
  • Further, this participant proposes an alternative scenario where the rope is lifted at one point, asking how high that point would be above the Earth's surface.
  • Another participant provides a mathematical approach to estimate the height of the rope when lifted, using approximations and power series to derive a formula for height based on the radius and the increase in rope length.
  • There is a reiteration of the challenge regarding the Earth's radius and its impact on the problem, emphasizing the complexity of the scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding the Earth's radius and the implications for the problem. There is no consensus on a single solution or approach, as multiple perspectives and configurations are presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence of the problem's solution on the definition of the Earth's radius and the assumptions made about the rope's configuration. Some mathematical steps and approximations remain unresolved.

topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
This isn't so much a challenge problem as much as it has a startling (at least I think so) answer.

Say we tie a rope around the Earth. Now we are going to cut it and add another 6 meters to it. If we pull the new rope tight (in a circle) how high is the new rope above the Earth's surface?

It's reasonably easy so if you've seen it before let someone else answer. (I first saw this problem in a "Dr. Crypton" article in "Science Digest.")

-Dan
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well the Earth's radius is $6371 ~ \text{km}$, so the original rope has a length of $2 \pi \times 6371 ~ \text{km}$. If we add $6 ~ \text{m} = 6 \times 10^{-3} ~ \text{km}$ to this rope, its new radius is:
$$\frac{2 \pi \times 6371 + 6 \times 10^{-3}}{2 \pi} \approx 6371.0009 ~ \text{km}$$
So the rope now "floats" about $0.0009 ~ \text{km} = 90 ~ \text{cm}$ above the ground. To be exact, $95.5 ~ \text{cm}$ (this is $\frac{6}{2 \pi} ~ \text{m}$).

Wait, what? My mind is blown :rolleyes:
 
topsquark said:
This isn't so much a challenge problem as much as it has a startling (at least I think so) answer.

Say we tie a rope around the Earth. Now we are going to cut it and add another 6 meters to it. If we pull the new rope tight (in a circle) how high is the new rope above the Earth's surface?

It's reasonably easy so if you've seen it before let someone else answer. (I first saw this problem in a "Dr. Crypton" article in "Science Digest.")

-Dan

I recall a version of this problem circulating several years ago among the performance car forums on which I used to be quite active, and there was much disbelief and dissension among the masses. (Rofl)
 
Bacterius said:
Well the Earth's radius is $6371 ~ \text{km}$
I take issue with this solution, which assumes that the Earth's radius is 6,371 km. This is just the mean radius. The equatorial radius is quite a bit larger at 6,378.1 km, while the polar radius is quite a bit smaller at 6,356.8 km. Clearly, the answer to the problem depends on the radius... hmm... never mind.

Here is another question: What happens if, after adding 6 m, we lift the rope by one point so that it is taut and lies flat on the surface for most of the circumference, as in the following picture?

Rope_height_2.jpg

How high above the Earth is the point by which the rope is lifted?
 
Last edited:
Evgeny.Makarov said:
I take issue with this solution, which assumes that the Earth's radius is 6,371 km. This is just the mean radius. The equatorial radius is quite larger at 6,378.1 km, while the polar radius is quite smaller at 6,356.8 km. Clearly, the answer to the problem depends on the radius... hmm... never mind.

Here is another question: What happens if, after adding 6 m, we lift the rope by one point so that it is taut and lies flat on the surface for most of the circumference, as in the following picture?

Rope_height_2.jpg

How high above the Earth is the point by which the rope is lifted?
Nice problem!
earth.png

If the circle has radius $R$ and the length of the rope is increased from $2\pi R$ to $2\pi R + \delta$ then, with $\theta$ as in the diagram, $2\pi R + \delta = 2(\pi - \theta)R + 2R\tan\theta$. Thus $\tan\theta - \theta = \frac{\delta}{2R}.$ This can't be solved exactly for $\theta$, but assuming that $\delta \ll R$ we can use the approximation $\tan\theta \approx \theta + \frac13\theta^3$ (first two terms of the power series for $\tan\theta$) to get $\dfrac\delta{2R} \approx \dfrac{\theta^3}3$, so that $\theta \approx \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3\delta}{2R}}$.

The distance $h$ of the high point of the rope from the circumference of the circle is $h = R(\sec\theta - 1)$. Again using the power series approximation, this time for $\sec\theta \approx 1 + \frac12\theta^2$, we have $$ h \approx \frac R2\Bigl(\frac{3\delta}{2R}\Bigr)^{2/3} = \sqrt[3]{\frac{9\delta^2R}{32}}.$$

Since this is just a rough approximation, I'll take the radius of the Earth to be $6\times 10^6$m. If $\delta = 6$m then that formula gives $h\approx 390$m.​
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
I take issue with this solution, which assumes that the Earth's radius is 6,371 km. This is just the mean radius. The equatorial radius is quite larger at 6,378.1 km, while the polar radius is quite smaller at 6,356.8 km. Clearly, the answer to the problem depends on the radius... hmm... never mind.

Here is another question: What happens if, after adding 6 m, we lift the rope by one point so that it is taut and lies flat on the surface for most of the circumference, as in the following picture?

Rope_height_2.jpg

How high above the Earth is the point by which the rope is lifted?
Even more mind blowing! (Shake)

-Dan
 
This problem and picture are taken from the MathForum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K