Ecological Pyramids: Producers Outnumber Consumers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the ecological pyramid of numbers, emphasizing that producers outnumber consumers due to the fundamental principles of biomass and energy transfer. It is established that consumer mass cannot exceed producer mass, as consumers rely on producers for sustenance. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding both mass and biomass, with a focus on the ratios of producers to consumers, which typically remain consistent despite fluctuations in human population and environmental changes like deforestation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ecological pyramids and their significance in ecology.
  • Knowledge of biomass and its distinction from mass.
  • Familiarity with energy transfer in food chains and ecosystems.
  • Basic concepts of autotrophs (producers) and heterotrophs (consumers).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of ecological pyramids and their applications in environmental science.
  • Study the differences between biomass and mass in biological contexts.
  • Explore energy transfer efficiency in food webs and its implications for ecosystem dynamics.
  • Investigate the impact of deforestation on producer and consumer populations in various ecosystems.
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in ecology, environmental scientists, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of ecosystems and the relationships between producers and consumers.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
According to ecological pyramid of numbers there are far more producers than consumers.How?I mean nowadays human population has increased so much and deforestation is also taking place in spite of all these how producers are far ahead from consumers in terms of numbers?Have i interpreted ecological pyramid correctly?Is it correct that there are far more producers than consumers?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
gracy said:
in terms of numbers?
Numbers? Or, mass?
 
Bystander said:
Numbers? Or, mass?
actually,both.
 
Compare numbers of blue whales to numbers of whatever little critters they consume, and then compare masses (total and individual) of blue whales to masses (total and individual) of critters.

Compare numbers and masses of termites to numbers and masses of cellulose producing plants.

Compare "consumption" in terms of mass consumed to mass of consumer per year. Can the consumers live on nothing if their total mass exceeds the mass of producers necessary to support that mass?
 
Bystander said:
Numbers? Or, mass?
I must mention it is not just mass it is biomass.So in terms of biomass and numbers.
 
Bystander said:
Compare numbers of blue whales to numbers of whatever little critters they consume, and then compare masses (total and individual) of blue whales to masses (total and individual) of critters.

Compare numbers and masses of termites to numbers and masses of cellulose producing plants.

Compare "consumption" in terms of mass consumed to mass of consumer per year. Can the consumers live on nothing if their total mass exceeds the mass of producers necessary to support that mass?
I am really not getting anything.Tomorrow is my test, can you please directly answer my question or make your point much clearer.I have to prepare for my test,there is no much time left.
 
Consumers can't eat food that isn't being produced. Consumer mass is never going to exceed producer mass.
 
Bystander said:
Consumers can't eat food that isn't being produced. Consumer mass is never going to exceed producer mass.
What's the difference between mass and biomass?
 
Biomass is any living (or once living) material derived originally from photosynthesis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #10
Bystander said:
Biomass is any living (or once living) material derived originally from photosynthesis.
If we talk about our mass ,is it greater or lesser than biomass?or just the same?i think mass is greater than biomass,as our mass include water which is not product of photosynthesis.right?
 
  • #11
The geochemical "rules of thumb" I learned measured "dry" mass, about 30 % of the mass of living organisms, or the actual organic material minus water. Different fields may look at total, organic mass plus water mass, but the ratios between producers and consumers will be very close to the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #12
Bystander said:
but the ratios between producers and consumers will be very close to the same.
ratio of what?
 
  • #13
Masses, whether wet or dry. Hundred kilograms of producers support ten kilograms of consumers, for example , that's a fifty year old rule of thumb, so use whatever ratio is being used in your class.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #14
Bystander said:
Masses, whether wet or dry. Hundred kilograms of producers support ten kilograms of consumers, for example , that's a fifty year old rule of thumb, so use whatever ratio is being used in your class.
is dry mass and biomass same thing?
 
  • #15
Bystander said:
Hundred kilograms of producers support ten kilograms of consumers,
Here supports mean?
 
  • #16
Biomass is anything of biological origin. "Dry" biomass is about 30% of wet biomass or living biomass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #17
"To support," to feed, keep alive.
 
  • #18
Bystander said:
Biomass is anything of biological origin. "Dry" biomass is about 30% of wet biomass or living biomass.
wet biomass?I thought dry mass(or dry biomass ?)is mass excluding water .And biomass is anything we obtain from photosynthesis.As water is not obtained from photosynthesis ,i thought dry mass is just same as biomass.But what is wet biomass now?
 
  • #19
Bystander said:
Hundred kilograms of producers support ten kilograms of consumers,
for how long?I mean we eat on daily basis so.....
 
  • #20
Geochemists talk about "dry mass." I do not know whether biologists or other life scientists define biomass as being "wet" or "dry." The grass that grows in the sun is biomass. The cow that eats the grass is biomass. The people who eat the cow are biomass.You will eat between two and three times your mass per year depending upon your activity level.
 
  • #21
Bystander said:
The cow that eats the grass is biomass. The people who eat the cow are biomass.
Whole cow ,whole person is considered to be biomass?i thought some fraction or percentage of their masses is considered to be biomass.
 
  • #22
Your choice, wet or dry, not mine.
 
  • #23
Bystander said:
Your choice, wet or dry, not mine.
Is it really about choice ?I mean there must be some concept behind this terms.
 
  • #24
The definition used in the textbook or course materials is the definition you should use.
 
  • #25
Bystander said:
Your choice, wet or dry, not mine.
Ok let the mass be whatever dry/wet/bio .Can you please help me to get the answer of my 19th post.
 
  • #26
Bystander said:
The definition used in the textbook or course materials is the definition you should use.
I will be using biomass as mass without water. Although my book doesn't clarify what biomass really is !even wikipedia explanation is getting beyond my understanding.
 
  • #27
You will eat two to three times your mass per year. Other organisms? Some more, some less.
 
  • #28
Bystander said:
You will eat two to three times your mass per year. Other organisms? Some more, some less.
So 100 Kilograms of plant is required to feed a person( whose mass is 10 kg) throughout the year.Or 100 Kilograms of plant is required to make and retain 10 kilogram of consumers.
I know this post (of mine)doesn't make any sense.
Sorry just tolerate this.Actually i am totally blank in this concept.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
Bystander said:
You will eat two to three times your mass per year
Sorry .Not getting!Please help ..Tomorrow is my test and i want to understand this concept*(question of my original post)
 
  • #30
It depends on the metabolic rate of the specific consumer: you eat two to three times your mass per year; a shrew might eat two to three times its mass per day. If "producer" biomass is insufficient to feed you or the shrew, you starve, reducing "consumer" biomass to whatever level "producer" biomass can support.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
18K