Ecological Pyramids: Producers Outnumber Consumers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ecological pyramid of numbers, specifically questioning why there appear to be more producers than consumers despite factors like human population growth and deforestation. Participants explore the concepts of biomass and mass in relation to producers and consumers, and the implications of these relationships on ecological dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the interpretation of the ecological pyramid, asking whether the comparison should be based on numbers or mass.
  • There is a discussion about the differences between mass and biomass, with some participants asserting that biomass refers to living or once-living material derived from photosynthesis.
  • Participants propose comparisons between the numbers and masses of various organisms, such as blue whales and their prey, to illustrate the relationships between producers and consumers.
  • One participant mentions that consumer mass cannot exceed producer mass, suggesting a fundamental ecological principle.
  • There is confusion regarding the definitions of wet and dry biomass, with participants discussing how these terms are used in different scientific contexts.
  • Some participants express a desire for clearer explanations, particularly in relation to the implications of biomass in ecological systems.
  • One participant reflects on the paradox of having more producers than consumers despite environmental changes like deforestation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the definitions and implications of mass and biomass, with no consensus reached on the interpretations of these terms or their ecological significance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between producers and consumers in the context of current environmental issues.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining biomass and mass, noting that different fields may have varying definitions. There is also uncertainty regarding the implications of these definitions on ecological relationships.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
According to ecological pyramid of numbers there are far more producers than consumers.How?I mean nowadays human population has increased so much and deforestation is also taking place in spite of all these how producers are far ahead from consumers in terms of numbers?Have i interpreted ecological pyramid correctly?Is it correct that there are far more producers than consumers?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
gracy said:
in terms of numbers?
Numbers? Or, mass?
 
Bystander said:
Numbers? Or, mass?
actually,both.
 
Compare numbers of blue whales to numbers of whatever little critters they consume, and then compare masses (total and individual) of blue whales to masses (total and individual) of critters.

Compare numbers and masses of termites to numbers and masses of cellulose producing plants.

Compare "consumption" in terms of mass consumed to mass of consumer per year. Can the consumers live on nothing if their total mass exceeds the mass of producers necessary to support that mass?
 
Bystander said:
Numbers? Or, mass?
I must mention it is not just mass it is biomass.So in terms of biomass and numbers.
 
Bystander said:
Compare numbers of blue whales to numbers of whatever little critters they consume, and then compare masses (total and individual) of blue whales to masses (total and individual) of critters.

Compare numbers and masses of termites to numbers and masses of cellulose producing plants.

Compare "consumption" in terms of mass consumed to mass of consumer per year. Can the consumers live on nothing if their total mass exceeds the mass of producers necessary to support that mass?
I am really not getting anything.Tomorrow is my test, can you please directly answer my question or make your point much clearer.I have to prepare for my test,there is no much time left.
 
Consumers can't eat food that isn't being produced. Consumer mass is never going to exceed producer mass.
 
Bystander said:
Consumers can't eat food that isn't being produced. Consumer mass is never going to exceed producer mass.
What's the difference between mass and biomass?
 
Biomass is any living (or once living) material derived originally from photosynthesis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #10
Bystander said:
Biomass is any living (or once living) material derived originally from photosynthesis.
If we talk about our mass ,is it greater or lesser than biomass?or just the same?i think mass is greater than biomass,as our mass include water which is not product of photosynthesis.right?
 
  • #11
The geochemical "rules of thumb" I learned measured "dry" mass, about 30 % of the mass of living organisms, or the actual organic material minus water. Different fields may look at total, organic mass plus water mass, but the ratios between producers and consumers will be very close to the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #12
Bystander said:
but the ratios between producers and consumers will be very close to the same.
ratio of what?
 
  • #13
Masses, whether wet or dry. Hundred kilograms of producers support ten kilograms of consumers, for example , that's a fifty year old rule of thumb, so use whatever ratio is being used in your class.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #14
Bystander said:
Masses, whether wet or dry. Hundred kilograms of producers support ten kilograms of consumers, for example , that's a fifty year old rule of thumb, so use whatever ratio is being used in your class.
is dry mass and biomass same thing?
 
  • #15
Bystander said:
Hundred kilograms of producers support ten kilograms of consumers,
Here supports mean?
 
  • #16
Biomass is anything of biological origin. "Dry" biomass is about 30% of wet biomass or living biomass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #17
"To support," to feed, keep alive.
 
  • #18
Bystander said:
Biomass is anything of biological origin. "Dry" biomass is about 30% of wet biomass or living biomass.
wet biomass?I thought dry mass(or dry biomass ?)is mass excluding water .And biomass is anything we obtain from photosynthesis.As water is not obtained from photosynthesis ,i thought dry mass is just same as biomass.But what is wet biomass now?
 
  • #19
Bystander said:
Hundred kilograms of producers support ten kilograms of consumers,
for how long?I mean we eat on daily basis so.....
 
  • #20
Geochemists talk about "dry mass." I do not know whether biologists or other life scientists define biomass as being "wet" or "dry." The grass that grows in the sun is biomass. The cow that eats the grass is biomass. The people who eat the cow are biomass.You will eat between two and three times your mass per year depending upon your activity level.
 
  • #21
Bystander said:
The cow that eats the grass is biomass. The people who eat the cow are biomass.
Whole cow ,whole person is considered to be biomass?i thought some fraction or percentage of their masses is considered to be biomass.
 
  • #22
Your choice, wet or dry, not mine.
 
  • #23
Bystander said:
Your choice, wet or dry, not mine.
Is it really about choice ?I mean there must be some concept behind this terms.
 
  • #24
The definition used in the textbook or course materials is the definition you should use.
 
  • #25
Bystander said:
Your choice, wet or dry, not mine.
Ok let the mass be whatever dry/wet/bio .Can you please help me to get the answer of my 19th post.
 
  • #26
Bystander said:
The definition used in the textbook or course materials is the definition you should use.
I will be using biomass as mass without water. Although my book doesn't clarify what biomass really is !even wikipedia explanation is getting beyond my understanding.
 
  • #27
You will eat two to three times your mass per year. Other organisms? Some more, some less.
 
  • #28
Bystander said:
You will eat two to three times your mass per year. Other organisms? Some more, some less.
So 100 Kilograms of plant is required to feed a person( whose mass is 10 kg) throughout the year.Or 100 Kilograms of plant is required to make and retain 10 kilogram of consumers.
I know this post (of mine)doesn't make any sense.
Sorry just tolerate this.Actually i am totally blank in this concept.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
Bystander said:
You will eat two to three times your mass per year
Sorry .Not getting!Please help ..Tomorrow is my test and i want to understand this concept*(question of my original post)
 
  • #30
It depends on the metabolic rate of the specific consumer: you eat two to three times your mass per year; a shrew might eat two to three times its mass per day. If "producer" biomass is insufficient to feed you or the shrew, you starve, reducing "consumer" biomass to whatever level "producer" biomass can support.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
18K