Economic analysis: replace machine now or later

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the economic analysis of whether to replace an old machine now or wait five years for its full depreciation. The present values calculated indicate that the new machine is worth more than the old one, but the participants emphasize the importance of considering cash flows and net present value (NPV) for accurate comparisons. Operating expenses and tax implications are critical factors in determining the overall cost-effectiveness of each scenario. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on salvage values and depreciation rates, as well as the timing of cash flows when calculating NPV. Ultimately, the analysis suggests that purchasing the new machine now may be more economical, but proper calculations are essential for a definitive conclusion.
  • #31
For scenario 2, then the sum would be

$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {350}{1.1^{n}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {-22,000}{1.1^{10n-1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {7500}{1.1^{10n-1}} $$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Maylis said:
For scenario 2, then the sum would be

$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {350}{1.1^{n}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {-22,000}{1.1^{10n-1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {7500}{1.1^{10n-1}} $$
Maylis said:
For scenario 2, then the sum would be

$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {350}{1.1^{n}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {-22,000}{1.1^{10n-1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {7500}{1.1^{10n-1}} $$
My understanding is:
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac {350}{1.1^{n}} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac {-22,000}{1.1^{10n}} +7500 $$
 
  • #33
I don't understand how you are picking your exponents for the interest rates in the sums. Why 10n, 10n-5??
 
  • #34
Maylis said:
What does that last term mean?
It means that you replace the old machine after 5 years, and then replace each new machine every subsequent 10 years.
 
  • #35
Maylis said:
I don't understand how you are picking your exponents for the interest rates in the sums. Why 10n, 10n-5??
In scenario 2, the 10n (starting with n = 0), means that you replace the machine immediately, and then every subsequent 10 years.

In scenarion 1, the 10n-5 (starting with n = 1) means that you replace the machine after 5 years, and then every subsequent 10 years.
 
  • Like
Likes gfd43tg
  • #36
Thanks, that is much more clearer now. Now I need to figure out how to actually calculate an infinite series :nb)
 
  • #37
Maylis said:
Thanks, that is much more clearer now. Now I need to figure out how to actually calculate an infinite series :nb)
a/(1-r)
 
  • #38
I found scenario 1 NPV to be -$21,953.7, and for scenario 2 it is -$24,804, so it is better to keep using the machine until it has finished its operating life.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K