Economics: Forcing Interest Rates Low

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of national legislation aimed at forcing mortgage lenders to offer loans at lower interest rates. Key outcomes include a decreased willingness to lend, increased transactional costs, and a potential collapse of the banking industry within six months due to the oligopoly power of remaining lenders. The legislation would likely lead to higher default rates among high-risk borrowers, while low-risk borrowers would bear the financial burden. Additionally, it may incentivize lenders to establish offshore operations to circumvent existing regulations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mortgage lending practices
  • Knowledge of economic principles related to interest rates
  • Familiarity with banking industry regulations
  • Awareness of risk assessment in lending
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of interest rate caps on mortgage lending
  • Explore the concept of oligopoly in the banking sector
  • Investigate offshore lending practices and regulations
  • Learn about risk management strategies for lenders
USEFUL FOR

Economists, financial analysts, policymakers, and anyone interested in the impacts of legislation on mortgage lending and banking stability.

Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
ECONOMICS

"Any legislation to force intestest rates lower will probable have to wait for a new president."

This is a quote from the talking heads at ABC news (ABC World News).

What would be the effects of national legislation forcing mortgage lenders, by law, to make loans at a lower rate?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Phrak said:
What would be the effects of national legislation forcing mortgage lenders, by law, to make loans at a lower rate?

Decreased willingness to lend, increase of transactional costs (to effectively raise the rates), further pressure to avoid lending to high-risk customers. If these options are not available (perhaps the legislation forbids them) then further collapse of the banking industry would be the likeliest outcome, though probably not for at least 6 months. This would continue until the oligopoly power of the remaining lenders increases to the point that the rent-seeking behavior (in this case, lending to low-risk customers at rates above the natural/competitive rate but at or below the legislated maximum and also at or below the monopoly price) offsets the profit loss from the forced loans.

The cost of forced loans to the companies would be a fixed price, a net transfer, which would not greatly alter their behavior (except indirectly, though failed companies) -- a good thing. It would, however, alter the behavior of high-risk customers, who would consume (relative to the natural/market conditions) 'too much' risk and consequently default more often than in that case.
 
CRGreathouse said:
...in this case, lending to low-risk customers at rates above the natural/competitive rate but at or below the legislated maximum and also at or below the monopoly price

I hadn't thought of that... Well done.

So the lower risk parties obtaining loans will pick up the tab for higher risk parties. This would tend to attract offshore lending institutions to seek-out low risk customers. Given the motivation, there should be a means to circumvent any preexisting federal legislation.

This would motivate lenders to set-up offshore operations themselves, and at the same time seek legislation to curtail foreign lenders (new competitors, in any case), I would think.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
25K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K