Edge, Screw, and mixed dislocations

  • Thread starter Thread starter scott_alexsk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Edge Mixed Screw
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relative abundance of edge, screw, and mixed dislocations in materials, exploring why one type may occur over another in different situations. The scope includes theoretical aspects of dislocation theory and practical observations from materials science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that mixed dislocations are the most prevalent type due to the complexities of real materials, which often exhibit both edge and screw characteristics.
  • One participant mentions a professor's estimate that edge dislocations might constitute 10-20% of dislocations in typical metallic crystals, though this estimate is noted to be vague and possibly lattice-dependent.
  • Another participant suggests that edge dislocations are stabilized at high temperatures while screw dislocations are favored at low temperatures, indicating a temperature-dependent behavior.
  • Experiences shared by participants indicate that mixed dislocations, including loops and tangles, are commonly observed in hcp Zr and Zr-alloys, particularly under irradiation conditions.
  • There is mention of a resurgence in interest in dislocation dynamics, with references to various books that cover dislocation mechanics and related theories.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the prevalence and behavior of dislocation types, with no consensus reached on specific percentages or conditions under which each type predominates.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations noted include the dependence on material types and conditions, as well as the complexity of real dislocation structures that may not fit neatly into the edge or screw classifications.

scott_alexsk
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have an idea as to the relative abundance of each of these types? Why will one type occur over the other in a given situation?

Thanks,
-Scott
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
An excellent question. In reality mixed type prevails (if you go as far as to consider 3D dislocation lines in a realistic material with its imperfect structure including point and volume defects, most dislocations have both edge and screw parts) since both main types are rather constrictive in their definitions, and its for example easy to "introduce" an edge part to a screw dislocation. I got to check this out from somewhere but remember when one material physics Prof. was "pushed" with the same question at some point very reluctantly he was "willing" to give edge dislocations a fraction of 10-20% in a typical metallic crystal (without giving any specifics - he probably just wanted to end the unease at that point :biggrin: ). I've no idea how accurate that estimate is - it does make sense "a somewhat" - but the problem as I see it is the answer is specific (like lattice dependent for one) and in reality the classification is quite difficult since our edge and screw models are only components of the real ones with all their jogs and complicated arrays. I'll see what Cottrell for one has to say.
 
scott_alexsk said:
Does anyone have an idea as to the relative abundance of each of these types? Why will one type occur over the other in a given situation?
Typically, edge dislocations are stabilized (possibly, they have a very low mobility) at high temperatures, and screw dislocations at low temperatures.
 
Thanks guys!
 
I just picked up a nice little book -

Elementary Dislocation Theory by Johannes and Julia Weertman.

I just started it and it seems decent.


In my experience, I've seen mostly mixed and that includes dislocation loops and tangles. However most of my experience is with hcp Zr and Zr-alloys, and refractory alloys, and most of that is irradiated.

I believe dislocations in alloys and poly-crystalline metals are mostly mixed.
 
Last edited:
It seems like the successes of discrete & continuum dislocation dynamics are resulting in a new rise in everything 'dislocations' related. Or whether it was ever really "down" ... . Year ago picked up a very good example of this: Computer Simulation of Dislocations, by Bulatov & Cai, which have enjoyed immensely. Johannes Weertman also has an excellent book "Dislocation Based Fracture Mechanics", which contains pretty much everything relevant need to know of the particular field (Griffith-Inglis crack, Zener-Stroh-Koehler crack, Yoffe crack, Bilby-Cottrell-Swinden-Dugdale crack, lots about dislocation mechanics, shielding and antishielding, and plenty of elastic-plastic theory). Julia and Johannes must have some pretty "interesting" table conversations :biggrin: .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K