Edward Witten: World-Renowned Superstring Theorist and Fields Medal Winner

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Phys988
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Edward Witten's academic journey, particularly his transition from an undergraduate degree in history to a Ph.D. in physics. Participants explore the implications of this shift, including potential prior studies in physics and mathematics, and the influence of his family background on his education.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how Witten transitioned from history to physics, wondering if he studied physics and mathematics during his undergraduate years or prior to that.
  • Others express interest in the perspective of historians regarding Witten's shift, speculating on whether it reflects positively on the field of history or suggests a loss of talent.
  • One participant provides a chronological overview of Witten's academic path, noting his initial studies in economics and politics before pursuing mathematics and physics.
  • There is curiosity about the duration of Witten's Ph.D. process, with speculation on whether he had a solid foundational knowledge from his father or needed to catch up on fundamental physics topics.
  • Another participant corrects a previous claim about Witten's political work, mentioning he was a speechwriter for the McGovern campaign, and reiterates interest in his potential prior training in mathematics and physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interest in Witten's academic transition, but there are multiple competing views regarding the extent of his prior training in physics and mathematics, as well as differing opinions on the implications of his career shift.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the specifics of Witten's undergraduate studies and whether his Ph.D. timeline includes any self-study in physics and mathematics. The discussion also reflects a lack of consensus on the interpretations of his career path.

Phys988
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Edward Witten is one of the world's leading researchers in superstring theory. He received his bachelor's degree in history (with a minor in linguistics) from Brandeis University, then he completed graduate studies in physics at Princeton University receiving a Ph.D. in physics in 1976. In1990 he was awarded the Fields Medal for his influence on the development of mathematics.(from Wikipedia)

So anyone knows how he shifted from undergraduate history degree to graduate physics degree?! Was he studying physics and math during his undergraduate studies or even before?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is something I also allways wanted to know. :confused:

BTW, I would also like to know what historians think about that. Do they think that "It proves that we (the historians) are very clever", or that "It's a pity that such a clever man left history"?
 
Phys988 said:
Edward Witten is one of the world's leading researchers in superstring theory. He received his bachelor's degree in history (with a minor in linguistics) from Brandeis University, then he completed graduate studies in physics at Princeton University receiving a Ph.D. in physics in 1976. In1990 he was awarded the Fields Medal for his influence on the development of mathematics.(from Wikipedia)

So anyone knows how he shifted from undergraduate history degree to graduate physics degree?! Was he studying physics and math during his undergraduate studies or even before?!

The full route, in chronological order, goes something like: got a degree in history and linguistics: started grad school in economics; tried a behind-the-scenes career in politics; started grad school in math; started grad school in physics.

Witten's father was a well-known physicist (relativist).
 
I heard he worked for the Goldwater campaign.
 
I'd actually be more interested to see how long his PhD took him. I wonder if he had a pretty solid background from his father, or if he had to catch up on the basics like EM and classical mechanics?
 
It took him 5 years (from the time he decided to switch into physics) to receive his PhD. But that all what you could find through Google. No information whether these 5 years includes undergraduate studies or it was only for graduate studies. If it was only for graduate studies, then you can assume that he was (alongside with history) self studding physics and mathematics (maybe with some help from his father).
 
He worked as a speechwriter for the McGovern campaign, not the Goldwater campaign. I'm also curious as to whether he studied math/physics as an undergraduate. Given the fact that he originally enrolled as an applied mathematics graduate student at Princeton, I would say that it's likely he had at least some prior training in mathematics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
249
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K