EFE's question regarding Ricci scalar

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter unchained1978
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ricci scalar Scalar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Einstein Field Equations (EFE) and the proper handling of indices when expanding the Ricci scalar. The Einstein tensor is defined as G_{\mu\nu}=R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}, where R=g^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu}. A critical point raised is the illegality of having an index appear more than twice, which prevents the erroneous expansion of the Ricci scalar that leads to confusion in deriving the EFE as R_{\mu\nu}=-4πGT_{\mu\nu}. The correct approach involves using the trace of the energy-momentum tensor to derive alternative forms of the EFE.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein Field Equations (EFE)
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and index manipulation
  • Knowledge of Ricci scalar and its definition
  • Basic principles of general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Einstein Field Equations in detail
  • Learn about tensor calculus and index notation
  • Explore the implications of the Ricci scalar in general relativity
  • Investigate alternative forms of the EFE and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity and the mathematical foundations of the Einstein Field Equations.

unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Quick question about the EFE's. When writing the einstein tensor [itex]G_{\mu\nu}=R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}[/itex], and using the definition of the Ricci scalar [itex]R=g^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu}[/itex], how does this not give you problems when you expand out [itex]R[/itex] so that the second term becomes [itex]-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu}g_{\mu\nu}=-2R_{\mu\nu}[/itex] when evaluating the trace, giving you the EFE's as [itex]R_{\mu\nu}=-4πGT_{\mu\nu}[/itex]?
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unchained1978 said:
Quick question about the EFE's. When writing the einstein tensor [itex]G_{\mu\nu}=R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}[/itex], and using the definition of the Ricci scalar [itex]R=g^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu}[/itex], how does this not give you problems when you expand out [itex]R[/itex] so that the second term becomes [itex]-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu}g_{\mu\nu}=-2R_{\mu\nu}[/itex] when evaluating the trace, giving you the EFE's as [itex]R_{\mu\nu}=-4πGT_{\mu\nu}[/itex]?
Any help would be appreciated.

In anyone term, an index can only appear at most twice, so [itex]-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu}g_{\mu\nu}[/itex] is not legal. Maybe you want to write [itex]R=g^{\alpha\beta}R_{\alpha\beta}[/itex], or maybe you want do do something like
[tex] \begin{align}<br /> \left( R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} \right) g^{\mu \nu} &= 8\pi T_{\mu\nu} g^{\mu \nu}\\<br /> -R = 8\pi T^\mu_\mu.<br /> \end{align}[/tex]
Using [itex]-R = 8\pi T^\alpha_\alpha[/itex] (after relabeling to avoid the same symbol being used as both a free index and a summed index) in [itex]R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi T_{\mu\nu}[/itex] gives [itex]R_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi \left( T_{\mu \nu} - \frac{1}{2}T^\alpha_\alpha g_{\mu\nu} \right)[/itex], another useful form of the EFE.
 
Thanks, I always thought there was some index trickery involved in resolving this, but I never knew about multiple repeated indices being disallowed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
963
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K