Effect for time lag in quantum erasure?

madison
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
When which way information is erased, interference reappears. Is there any theoretical
and experimentally confirmed evidence that the interval between pair creation and erasure
has any effect? The experiments I've read seem more concerned with evidencing the
erasure and delayed erasure result rather than mapping interference differences alomg
the full length of the idler arm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PhysicsForums, madison!

There have been sensitive experiments to determine if entanglement occurs in a finite amount of time - and it appears to be instantaneous (at least 10,000 times c). Not sure if that is in effect what you are asking, but there does not seem to be anything detectible regarding ordering of observing Alice or Bob.
 
DrChinese said:
Welcome to PhysicsForums, madison!

There have been sensitive experiments to determine if entanglement occurs in a finite amount of time - and it appears to be instantaneous (at least 10,000 times c). Not sure if that is in effect what you are asking, but there does not seem to be anything detectible regarding ordering of observing Alice or Bob.

yes i think this answers my question. In quantum erasure and delayed erasure experiments
I conclude that erasure of which way information - either before or after negotiating
2 slits- restores interference.

It does not matter whether erasure happens first or interference happens first, knowledge
(future or past) is enough and at the speeds you quote then that information is instantaneous.

Thanks for your help.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top