Effect of Immersed Iron Piece on Spring Balance Reading | Physics Q&A

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rishch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effect of an immersed iron piece on the reading of a spring balance. Initially, a spring balance reads 10 kg with a bucket of water suspended from it. When an iron piece is immersed in the water, the correct answer to the change in reading is (B) increase, due to the buoyant force exerted by the water on the iron piece, which in turn exerts a downward force on the water. This interaction clarifies that reaction forces occur between two bodies, regardless of whether one is stationary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyant force principles
  • Knowledge of Newton's Third Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with spring balance mechanics
  • Basic concepts of force interactions in fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle
  • Explore Newton's Third Law of Motion in depth
  • Research the mechanics of spring balances and their applications
  • Investigate fluid dynamics and force interactions in different mediums
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of forces and buoyancy in fluid systems.

rishch
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
Q. A spring balance read 10 kg when a bucket of water is suspended from it. An iron piece having some mass is suspended by another string and is then immersed in the bucket with half of its volume. The reading of the spring balance will -

(A)decrease
(B)increase
(C)remain the same
(D)another spring balance needed

My answer to this question would be (C) as the iron piece is suspended by another string so it does not apply any force on the spring balance. However, according to the answer book the correct answer is (B) and the reason they give is this - The iron piece experiences buoyant force exerted by water. The iron piece will exert an equal and opposite downward force on water. So reading of balance will increase.

Is it possible for an object to exert a reaction force while it is stationary ? Wouldn't it exert a force on the string that its attached to instead of on the water ? Is that possible ? Could an object exert a reaction force on an object apart from the one which exerted the action force ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rishch! :smile:
rishch said:
Is it possible for an object to exert a reaction force while it is stationary ?

A reaction force usually is between stationary objects. :wink:
Wouldn't it exert a force on the string that its attached to instead of on the water ? Is that possible ?

it exerts (and receives) a force from both

remember, the water doesn't know the string is there :rolleyes:

it only knows that the iron is shoving its way in!
Could an object exert a reaction force on an object apart from the one which exerted the action force ?

no

reaction forces come in pairs, always between the same two bodies

any other pair of forces … even if they are equal and opposite … aren't a reaction pair
 
Thanks !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
27K