Chemistry Effect of temperature change in Le Chatelier's Principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between temperature changes and equilibrium constants in the context of Le Chatelier's Principle, expressed by the equation involving ΔH, R, and temperatures T1 and T2. Participants seek to understand how to derive this equation, which illustrates how the equilibrium constant (K) varies with temperature due to changes in enthalpy (ΔH). The Clausius-Clapeyron equation is mentioned as a relevant concept for this derivation. The challenge lies in applying these principles to accurately calculate the shifts in equilibrium constants with temperature variations. Understanding this relationship is crucial for predicting the behavior of chemical systems under different thermal conditions.
Huzaifa
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
How to derive $$
\log \left(\frac{\mathrm{K}_{2}}{\mathrm{~K}_{1}}\right)=\frac{\Delta \mathrm{H}}{2.303 \mathrm{R}}\left[\frac{1}{\mathrm{~T}_{1}}-\frac{1}{\mathrm{~T}_{2}}\right]
$$
Relevant Equations
$$
\log \left(\frac{\mathrm{K}_{2}}{\mathrm{~K}_{1}}\right)=\frac{\Delta \mathrm{H}}{2.303 \mathrm{R}}\left[\frac{1}{\mathrm{~T}_{1}}-\frac{1}{\mathrm{~T}_{2}}\right]
$$
The effect of temperature change in Le Chatelier's Principle is given by the equation $$ \log \left(\frac{\mathrm{K}_{2}}{\mathrm{~K}_{1}}\right)=\frac{\Delta \mathrm{H}}{2.303 \mathrm{R}}\left[\frac{1}{\mathrm{~T}_{1}}-\frac{1}{\mathrm{~T}_{2}}\right] $$. How to derive $$ \log \left(\frac{\mathrm{K}_{2}}{\mathrm{~K}_{1}}\right)=\frac{\Delta \mathrm{H}}{2.303 \mathrm{R}}\left[\frac{1}{\mathrm{~T}_{1}}-\frac{1}{\mathrm{~T}_{2}}\right] $$. I am not able to derive it as equilibrium constant changes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google for Clausius-Clapeyron equation.
 
2021_12_17_f25eb23aa3c6eec50d16g-1.jpg
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top