Effect of temperature on semiconductors' conductivity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of temperature on the conductivity of semiconductors, exploring the mechanisms behind changes in conductivity with temperature, and comparing these effects to those observed in metals. The scope includes theoretical explanations and conceptual clarifications regarding charge carriers and mobility.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the conductivity of semiconductors increases with temperature due to the release of more free electrons.
  • Others question whether the increase in free electrons outweighs the effects of lattice vibrations and scattering on conductivity.
  • One participant notes that in metals, the number of free charge carriers remains constant, leading to increased resistance with temperature due to decreased mobility.
  • In contrast, it is suggested that in semiconductors, the exponential increase in charge carriers with temperature can override the decrease in mobility, resulting in increased conductivity.
  • A participant highlights that conductivity is a function of both the number of free charge carriers and their mobility, emphasizing that if the increase in carriers is greater than the decrease in mobility, conductivity will rise.
  • Examples of devices with negative temperature coefficients, such as light bulbs and diodes, are provided, alongside examples of devices with positive coefficients, like metal wires and field effect transistors.
  • Another participant mentions that incandescent bulb filaments exhibit a positive temperature coefficient, while a carbon rod may show a negative coefficient.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the effects of temperature on conductivity, with no consensus reached on the relative impacts of free charge carriers and lattice vibrations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific mechanisms at play.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions and assumptions about charge carrier behavior and material properties, which are not fully explored in the discussion.

Entanglement
Messages
438
Reaction score
13
I've known that the conductivity of semiconductors increase with temperature because more electrons are freed,
But why doesn't the scattering and vibrations of the lattice affect the conductivity in semiconductors as in metals?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Does the effect of additional free electrons outweighs the effect of the greater vibrations of the lattice so the overall resistance will decrease ??
 
Temperature changes have many different effects upon semiconductors; they are well discussed here:
http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9781461407478-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1268751-p174130080

The link will download a pdf.
 
UltrafastPED said:
Temperature changes have many different effects upon semiconductors; they are well discussed here:
http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9781461407478-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1268751-p174130080

The link will download a pdf.
That's quite complicated to me I just want a normal answer . :smile:
 
In metals the number of free charge carriers is constant. As the temperature goes up their mobility goes down. Because the carriers can't move as much there is higher resistance.

In semiconductors the number of charge carriers increase exponentially with temperature and this overrides the decrease in mobility.

It turns out that we're lucky. Semiconductors have a complex behavior over a wide range of temperatures. It just so happens that they behave like useful semiconductors at temperatures that we're accustomed to on Earth.

EDIT: I should have said that conductivity is a function of the number of free charge carriers multiplied by their mobility. If the number of carriers increases faster than the decrease in mobility then conductivity can increase with temperature.

If a device's resistance goes down with temperature then we say that it has a negative temperature coefficient. This is not necessarily directly related to the conductivity of the device's material makeup. Other physical processes can affect the temperature coefficient.

Some things that have negative coefficients:
-light bulbs
-diodes
-bipolar junction transistors

Some things that have positive coefficients:
-metal wires
-Field effect transistors
 
Last edited:
Incandescent bulb filaments have a positive temperature coefficient.

I believe a carbon rod will show a negative coefficient.
 
Okefenokee said:
In metals the number of free charge carriers is constant. As the temperature goes up their mobility goes down. Because the carriers can't move as much there is higher resistance.
In semiconductors the number of charge carriers increase exponentially with temperature and this overrides the decrease in mobility.
It turns out that we're lucky. Semiconductors have a complex behavior over a wide range of temperatures. It just so happens that they behave like useful semiconductors at temperatures that we're accustomed to on Earth.
EDIT: I should have said that conductivity is a function of the number of free charge carriers multiplied by their mobility. If the number of carriers increases faster than the decrease in mobility then conductivity can increase with temperature.
If a device's resistance goes down with temperature then we say that it has a negative temperature coefficient. This is not necessarily directly related to the conductivity of the device's material makeup. Other physical processes can affect the temperature coefficient.
Some things that have negative coefficients:

-light bulbs

-diodes

-bipolar junction transistors
Some things that have positive coefficients:

-metal wires

-Field effect transistors
An Excellent reply, thanks ! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
944
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
804
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K