Effective density & Intrinsic carrier concentration

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the relationship n=ni*e^(Ef-Efi)/KT using the equation n=Nc*e^-(Ec-Ef)/KT. Participants clarify the definitions of terms like Nc (effective density of states in the conduction band) and ni (intrinsic carrier concentration), noting their dependence on temperature and effective mass. The connection between Nc and ni is established through the intrinsic semiconductor case, leading to the desired proof. There is also a brief exchange regarding the expression for Nc and potential unit system differences. The conversation emphasizes the applicability of the result to non-degenerate semiconductors.
Mimi
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given "n=Nc*e-(Ec-Ef)/KT", prove "n=ni*e(Ef-Efi)/KT"


Homework Equations


Quasi-Fermi Energies..? Ef is Fermi level (extrinsic) and Efi is Fermi level (intrinsic). Ec is Fermi level (conduction).


The Attempt at a Solution


Very honestly, I cannot figure out how to start...
I know the value of "Nc", but I don't know how to deal with "ni" to prove the relationship.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there given any relation between Nc and ni ?
Can you say more about Nc? What is the expression of Nc??
 
Nc=2[(2pi*m*KT)/h^2]^(3/2). (m=m*, effective mass for n)
ni^2=NcNv*e^-(Ec-Ev)/KT.
These are the only values I know...
 
Mimi said:
Nc=2[(2pi*m*KT)/h^2]^(3/2). (m=m*, effective mass for n)
ni^2=NcNv*e^-(Ec-Ev)/KT.
These are the only values I know...

You have Nc and Nv, i guess Nv is something related to the holes, right?
having Nv=2[(2pi*m*KT)/h^2]^(3/2). (m=m*, effective mass for p)
and p=Nv*e-(Ef-Ev)/KT. :blushing:

Consider intrinsic semiconductor case (ie n=p=ni)
we denote the intrinsic Fermi level as Efi and
n=Nc*e-(Ec-Ef)/KT
gives
ni=Nc*e-(Ec-Efi)/kT

Then, it can be seen that
n=ni*e(Ef-Efi)/KT

Notes: This result can be applied to any non-degenerate semiconductor (ie not just intrinsic/undoped semiconductor)

Once little thing i want to confirm is that,
what i learn for Nc is as a form of 2[(m*KT)/2pi*h^2]^(3/2) but not 2[(2pi*m*KT)/h^2]^(3/2).
Are you using cgs unit system?? I don't know this makes the difference or not...:redface:
 
oh..I see.
Thank you so much tnho!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
37K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K