Effects of Removing a Spring on Oscillating Mass: Analysis and Amplitude Changes

  • Thread starter Thread starter MeMoses
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass oscillating between two springs and the effects of removing one spring on the oscillation characteristics, specifically the resulting position function x(t) and the new amplitude. The mass is initially at equilibrium when centered between the two springs, and the question arises about the changes in motion and energy conservation when one spring is removed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations for x(t) before and after the removal of the spring, questioning how to relate the amplitudes and understand the implications of energy conservation. There are attempts to express constants A and B in terms of the amplitude d and to clarify the conditions at t=0.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have offered guidance on expressing the constants and relating them to the amplitude, while others are questioning the assumptions and conditions provided in the problem statement. There is a focus on deriving relationships between the equations and understanding the implications of the changes in the system.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the initial conditions and the timing of the spring's removal, which have led to some confusion among participants. The problem's setup includes specific values for the amplitude and the conditions at t=0, which are critical for determining the new amplitude after one spring is removed.

MeMoses
Messages
127
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass is between 2 springs between 2 walls. The mass oscillates with amplitude d. The springs are at equilibrium when the mass is in the center. At the moment the mass is in the center a spring is removed. What is the resulting x(t) and the new amplitude? Note the k's are equal.
Edit: I forgot to add that at t=0 x(t)=d/2 when there is one spring.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


So I solved for x(t) for both before and after removing the spring.
Before: x(t) = Asin(2wt) + Bcos(2wt)
after: x(t) = Asin(wt) + Bsin(wt)
I'm just assuming the new amplitude is twice what is was since when the spring is removed it has the energy of 2 springs, but now the resistance of one. Is there a way to show this using the x(t)'s I found? I feel like they should relate to the problem more.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. With both in equilibrium, means not forces applied to the mass.
2. If the mass displaced with 2 springs, then with only one spring we have to take conservation of energy into consideration.
 
1. It is oscillating with amplitude d, we know forces are being applied.
2. I know we can use conservation of energy, but is there anyway using the x(t) that i derived?
 
Before: x(t) = Asin(2wt) + Bcos(2wt)
after: x(t) = Asin(wt) + Bsin(wt)
-------------------------------
The amplitude must be different for both cases.
 
for before I get just x(t) = Asin(2wt) since x(0)=0 but how do I show the amplitude difference with these equations? Edit: Actually scratch that, x(0) = d/2, I'll see where this gets me
 
The As and Bs are different in the two equations. You need to express one set via the other. A and B in the initial equation must be expressible via d and the condition that at t = 0 the mass is going through the equilibrium point.
 
I can solve for B using x(0) = 0 but for A do i have to use the fact that Asin(wt) + Bcos(wt) should equal 2d at their max, so when wt = pi/4, and then solve for A?
 
B (for the original equation) = 0, that's correct. So the original equation is x = A sin 2wt. What is A in terms of d?
 
Sorry. I fogot to include an important fact in the question. I just added it. Using that I get B = d/2, so how do I get A? What I was thinking in #7 was wrong, I'm guessing I just find a maximum of my function using derivatives, which won't work either, nevermind.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Where does this additional condition come from? Is it part of the problem? What time is t = 0?
 
  • #11
It is from the problem and t = 0 is when the spring disappears (also in the problem). I tried to only type the relevant stuff. I clearly didnt understand the problem fully
 
  • #12
This new condition contradicts the other statement. One spring is said to disappear when the mass is at the center. That means x(0) = 0. x = d/2 means the mass is half-way between the center and the maximum displacement.
 
  • #13
Ok now that makes sense. It does not disappear when m is at the middle, but when x=d/2 at which t=0. I am really glad I read properly, but I'm still not sure how to find A or the new amplitude
 
  • #14
Does the problem specify in which direction the mass was moving when the spring separated?
 
  • #15
Yes, to the right. How is that relevant?
 
  • #16
To get A, you have to simplify the equation

x = A \sin 2 \omega t - B \cos 2 \omega t

Divide it through by ## \sqrt {A^2 + B^2} ##, that will get you

x = \sqrt {A^2 + B^2}[ a\sin 2 \omega t - b \cos 2 \omega t ]

where ## a \le 1, \ b \le 1 ## so you could let ##a = \cos \alpha, \ b = \sin \alpha ##, and use trigonometry to transform the equation further.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Well don't I already know B=d/2 using x(0), so is there not an easier method?
 
  • #18
Using this method, you convert ## x = A \sin 2 \omega t + B \cos 2 \omega t ## into ## x = \sqrt {A^2 + B^2} \sin (2 \omega t + \alpha) ##, and it is then obvious that ## d = \sqrt {A^2 + B^2} ##.
 
  • #19
I honestly have no idea how or why/how you did that or how you decided that it needed to be done, nor do i see how d is obvious.
 
  • #20
Re how I did that, go the previous page and how another look.

Re why d is obvious: look at ## x = \sqrt {A^2 + B^2} \sin (2 \omega t + \alpha) ## - what is the maximum value of it? Then recall the definition of amplitude.

That explains WHY I did that.
 
  • #21
OK that makes more sense, just a few more question. You said divide it through by sqrt(A^2 + B^2). If dividing by that, how does the sqrt end up being multiplied by the sin and cos? Also where do a and b come from? why must they be <=1? and why can we just let them = cos(alpha) and such? I'm just a little lost with this method
 
  • #22
also if d = sqrt(A**2 + B**2) isn't that d for the amplitude of just one spring, which isn't known? A isn't known as well so it doesn't seem to get me anywhere.
 
  • #23
Little a and b are big A and B divided by the common factor; admittedly, "divide through" was a bit inaccurate an expression, more properly it should be "extract common factor". Can you see now why they should satisfy the inequalities?

As for the trigonometric representation of a and b, imagine a unit circle centered at the origin of the XY plane. Now take x = a and y = b. They will be within the unit circle due to the inequalities they satisfy. So they will correspond to ONE point at the circle, and that point also have a corresponding angle. And a and b are then expressed via that angle.
 
  • #24
MeMoses said:
also if d = sqrt(A**2 + B**2) isn't that d for the amplitude of just one spring, which isn't known? A isn't known as well so it doesn't seem to get me anywhere.

The problem states that d was for two springs. You have obtained B = d/2, so from this equation you can determine A.
 
  • #25
So I thought ## x = \sqrt {A^2 + B^2} \sin (2 \omega t + \alpha) ## was equal to x(t) for one spring. Your saying that solving amplitude for it gives me d (from 2 springs) but the equation uses A and B from x(t) with just one spring? If its equivalent to x(t) for 1 spring we don't know that value of amplitude, if its equivalent to x(t) for 2 springs, we don't know A or B
 
  • #26
All the time till now I have been discussing the ORIGINAL equation with two springs. We need to determine its constants A and B in order to obtain the velocity at time t = 0 and thus have initial conditions for subsequent motion.
 
  • #27
So then A for the original equation is sqrt(d**2 - d**2/4) and then the velocity from the 2 springs at t=0 is the same as the velocity of one spring at t=0 so set them equal and then A=2sqrt(d**2-d**2/4) for one spring. The same d = sqrt(A**2+B**2) should apply here as well if I am not mistaken.
 
  • #28
The two-spring A is indeed ## \sqrt {d^2 - d^2/4} = d \frac {\sqrt 3} 2 ##.

I do not follow the rest of your argument, however. You have not yet computed the velocity at t = 0, but you seem to be jumping at conclusions about subsequent motion.
 
  • #29
At t=0 (the moment the spring disappears) v(0) using the equation from 2 springs will equal v(0) using the equation for 1 spring, which gives w*d*sqrt(3)=w*A => A = d*sqrt(3). That was the last unknown for the 1 spring equation. Using the same method for the 2 spring system then the amplitude = sqrt(A**2 + B**2) and everything has been answered.
 
  • #30
So what is the amplitude for the 1-spring system?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
953
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
813
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K