Efficient Automotive Timing Belt for Low Speed Applications

  • Context: Automotive 
  • Thread starter Thread starter robs314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Automotive Belt
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the selection of a timing belt for a 60 kW continuous system operating at approximately 1100 RPM, with a focus on the suitability of automotive belts for this low-speed application. Participants explore the challenges of finding appropriate specifications and the differences in design requirements between automotive and industrial timing belts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the difficulty in finding engineering manuals or specifications for automotive belts, suggesting that existing resources are primarily organized by car model.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the power requirements for automotive applications, questioning the comparison between the participant's needs and typical automotive scenarios.
  • A different participant clarifies that their application genuinely requires 60 kW, acknowledging the high power demand.
  • Concerns are raised about the longevity and robustness of automotive belts, with one participant sharing personal experiences of premature wear in automotive applications.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of power, force, and velocity on belt design, with one participant explaining that higher power at low RPM necessitates larger belts or pulleys to handle increased forces.
  • A participant suggests that while automotive belts may be worth considering, their application does not require the same longevity as automotive engines, leading to a question about the appropriateness of automotive belts for shorter operational periods.
  • Another participant highlights the significant torque and force that the belt must withstand, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of belt size and strength.
  • One participant expresses relief at having their initial approach validated and decides to discontinue the search for automotive belting data based on the feedback received.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the suitability of automotive belts for the specified application. There are competing views regarding the power requirements and the longevity of automotive belts compared to industrial belts.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the adequacy of automotive belts for high power applications, and there are unresolved questions regarding the specific design requirements and performance characteristics of both automotive and industrial timing belts.

robs314
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am choosing a timing belt for a 60kw continuous system at roughly 1100rpm. This is a relatively low speed application.
After using the belt selection programs written by Gates, Emerson and Goodyear, they all seem to point towards quite hefty installations with large pulley diameters and widths.

However, automotive belts must be able to transfer powers of this sort of magnitude, yet the pulleys used in these applications are much smaller.

I have found it very hard to find engineering manuals/specs for automotive belts. It seems only possible to search by car model type.

Does anyone know of any sources of automotive belt specs and manuals for the purpose of design?

Many thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I seriously doubt it takes 60 kw to turn over a camshaft. So I would say it's not apples to apples.
 
My application is not an automotive one. The motor that needs a belt really does develop 60Kw, which I accept is quite large.
 
Apart from the mismatch of power requirements, many production automobile belts are wimpy designs that are "throw away" replacement items. (On the last GM car I owned, the original 80,000m design life had been reduced to 40,000m, by which time not only was the belt just about shredded but the cheap plastic tensioning pulley was usually cracked as well. (Silly me for buying an American-designed engine, I guess).

40,000 miles is only about 1000 hours life. That's not much if you need something that runs continuously..

Also, power = force x velocity, so if you want high power at low RPM that will mean a bigger belt to take the bigger force, or large pulleys to increase the belt speed.
 
Many thanks for your replies

I had a suspicion that it was down to longetivity more than anything else. However, my application only needs to be operational for less time than a car's engine, so would it be wiser for me to go down the automotive route?
If it were a blower, or compressor or something running all day, I wouldn't hesitate with a larger spec.

Thanks
 
You're asking the belt to withstand almost 400 ft.lbs of torque. If you have a 4 inch pulley, that's almost 1200 lb of force acting to pull the belt apart. That's pretty serious.

How big a belt would you need to lift the front end of the average small car? The typical timing belt might survive but the teeth wouldn't.

Call the tech line at Gates and listen to the tech adviser.
 
It has put my mind at rest that I was following the right approach to start with. I just thought automotive belts should be worth looking at, that's all.

Your advice has meant that I will not have to spend any more time looking for automotive belting data.

I'm very grateful, thank you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
5K