Eigenfunction of electron in E and B fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a free electron in a constant magnetic field and a perpendicular electric field, focusing on finding energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions using harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions. The problem involves the Hamiltonian of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field, with specific expressions for the vector and scalar potentials provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss substituting expressions for the vector and scalar potentials into the Hamiltonian and transforming the Hamiltonian to resemble that of a harmonic oscillator. There are attempts to manipulate terms and coordinate transformations to address the influence of the scalar potential.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different substitutions and transformations to simplify the Hamiltonian. Some guidance has been offered regarding the impact of the constant term on eigenfunctions, but there remains uncertainty about how to handle specific terms and the overall approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of previous problems solved with different potentials, and participants express confusion about the role of certain terms in the Hamiltonian, particularly regarding momentum components and their relation to harmonic oscillator solutions.

Yaelcita
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a free electron in a constant magnetic field \vec{B}=B\hat{z} and a perpendicular electric field \vec{E}=\varepsilon\hat{y}. Find the energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in terms of harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions
Hint: Use Landau gauge \vec{A}=-By\hat{x}

What I actually don't understand is at the end... read on

Homework Equations


The Hamiltonian of a charged particle in an external em field is
H=\frac{1}{2m}\left(\vec{p}-\frac{q}{c}\vec{A}\right)^2+q\phi
The hint says to use \vec{A}=-By\hat{x} and since \vec{E}=-\nabla\phi I can make \phi=-\varepsilon y

The Attempt at a Solution


Plug in expressions for A and \phi into H, which gives
H=\frac{1}{2m}\left(p_x^2+p_y^2+p_z^2+\left(\frac{qB}{c}\right)^2y^2+\frac{qB}{c}p_x y\right)-q\varepsilon y

I know I just have to play around with this expression to make it look like a harmonic oscillator, but I have no idea how... In another problem that I solved, I used an A potential with both an x and a y components, but I didn't have the scalar potential in that case. It's that term that ruins everything!

Any ideas??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The scalar potential, which is just proportional to y, should only serve to change your equilibrium position for your harmonic oscillator. Kind of like gravity acting on a spring. I think you can make coordinate transformations to this new equilibrium position.

I'm not 100% sure on this, but see if you can do something with it.
 
Ok, let's see...

Let y=y'+\frac{\varepsilon m c^2}{q B^2}. Now the Hamiltonian reads (ignoring the unimportant parts):

H&=&\frac{1}{2m}\left(p_x+\frac{qB}{c}\left(y'+\frac{\varepsilon mc^2}{qB^2}\right)\right)^2-q\varepsilon\left(y'+\frac{\varepsilon mc^2}{qB^2}\right)

&=& \frac{1}{2m}\left(p_x+\frac{qB}{c}y'+\frac{\varepsilon mc}{B}\right)^2-q\varepsilon y'-\frac{\varepsilon^2mc^2}{B^2}

=\frac{1}{2m}\left(p_x+\frac{qB}{c}y'\right)^2+\frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{\varepsilon c}{B}\right)^2+\left(p_x+\frac{qB}{c}y'\right)\frac{\varepsilon c}{B}-q\varepsilon y'-\frac{\varepsilon^2 mc^2}{B^2}

=\frac{1}{2m}\left(p_x+\frac{qB}{c}y'\right)^2-\frac{mc^2\varepsilon^2}{2B^2}+p_x\frac{\varepsilon c}{B}

I think I know what to do with the stuff in parenthesis, but I don't know how to get rid of the constant term and the p_x term... Do they matter? I guess I don't really know how to continue after all...
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure I follow your substitution (also, where'd all the py and pz's go?). Actually, the momentum in the y direction is the momentum you want to couple with the y's to get a harmonic oscillator.

Hmm, perhaps someone better at this can help you. It's been a while since I've actually worked out problems like this.
 
Matterwave said:
(also, where'd all the py and pz's go?)

I just didn't write it, since I was working only with those two terms...

Matterwave said:
Actually, the momentum in the y direction is the momentum you want to couple with the y's to get a harmonic oscillator.

I know, but I have the solution to this one problem where they then go on to define raising and lowering operators as x\pm i p_x and the same for y, and they get the Hamiltonian to look like the product of a raising and a lowering operator plus a half, so I thought if I could make it look like that I could just use that solution, but I don't know what to do with the constant term, and the p_x term, more importantly.
 
Well, the constant isn't going to mess with the eigenfunctions right, you can just bring it to the other side of the eigenfunction equation.

H*psi=E*psi

So, you can just bring the constant over to the right side of the equation, and it would only adjust your eigenvalue.

The px part also stumps me...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K