Eigenfunction of momentum and operators

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the eigenfunction of momentum and demonstrating the completeness relation in quantum mechanics. The momentum operator is applied to the spatial wavefunction of a free particle, leading to the expression for the eigenfunction. Participants clarify that the parameter p in the completeness relation is not specific but serves as an integration variable. The wavefunction corresponding to the momentum state is defined, and its relationship to the completeness relation is emphasized, requiring proof that the states with this wavefunction satisfy the completeness condition. Ultimately, the focus is on showing that the integral of the momentum states leads to the identity operator for any state.
Philip Land
Messages
56
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Skärmavbild 2018-10-19 kl. 20.28.10.png

Homework Equations


##\hat{P}= -ih d/dx##

The Attempt at a Solution



To actually obtain ##\psi_{p_0}## I guess one can apply the momentum operator on the spatial wavefunction. If we consider a free particle (V=0) we can easily get obtain ##\psi = e^{\pm i kx}##, where ##k= \sqrt{2mE/ \hbar}##.

By now applying momentum operator we get ##\hat{P} \psi= -ih \cdot \pm i \sqrt{2mE/ \hbar} ##. This is as far as I get, how do I actually get the eigenfunction of momentum on the required form?

And 2:
How do I show that the completeness relation is satisfied for that 'specific' expression? I know that we can express ##|x> = \int dp |p><p|x>,##take ##-i \hbar \frac{d}{d_x} f_p(x) = p f_p(x)## and turn into a Fourier transformation (including k in the kernel) and get ##p' \tilde{f_p(p')}## which can be solved picking p=p' and any function of p can be converted into an eigenfunction if we transform back to x s.t ##f_p(x) = \int dp e^{ipx \hbar} \tilde{f_p(p)}##, but I have no idea how to use this to confirm the completeness relation for the above expression...
 

Attachments

  • Skärmavbild 2018-10-19 kl. 20.11.08.png
    Skärmavbild 2018-10-19 kl. 20.11.08.png
    25.2 KB · Views: 1,181
  • Skärmavbild 2018-10-19 kl. 20.28.10.png
    Skärmavbild 2018-10-19 kl. 20.28.10.png
    10.2 KB · Views: 960
Physics news on Phys.org
1) You do not need to derive the eigenfunction. Just show that the given function is the eigenfunction.

2) You need to show that ##\int |p\rangle \langle p| dp## is the identity operator, i.e., that acting on any state with it gives back the same state.
 
Ahh okey, that made the first part very easy.

Orodruin said:
2) You need to show that ∫|p⟩⟨p|dp∫|p⟩⟨p|dp\int |p\rangle \langle p| dp is the identity operator, i.e., that acting on any state with it gives back the same state.

And on 2) what exactly is p in that equation?
 
It is just a parameter labelling the momentum eigenstates.
 
Orodruin said:
It is just a parameter labelling the momentum eigenstates.
Okey, so I'm a bit confused about the state vs ##\psi_{p_0}## which is a function. Could I rewrite the function as a state somehow?
 
Philip Land said:
Okey, so I'm a bit confused about the state vs ##\psi_{p_0}## which is a function. Could I rewrite the function as a state somehow?
Because plugging in ##\psi## in the equation returns ##p_0^2 / \hbar \cdot \int dp. ##
 
The wave function ##\psi(x)## for any state ##|\psi\rangle## is defined as ##\psi(x) = \langle x|\psi\rangle##.
 
Oki I see. Are there way to get p for this specific case which I ultimately can plug into the completeness theorem?
 
There is no specific p. The ##p## in the completeness relation is an integration variable.
 
  • #10
Orodruin said:
There is no specific p. The ##p## in the completeness relation is an integration variable.
If there's no specific, p, how can I check it for a specific case?
 
  • #11
You should not be checking it for a specific case. You should show that it is always the identity operator.
 
  • #12
Orodruin said:
You should not be checking it for a specific case. You should show that it is always the identity operator.
"Show that the expression above satisfies it"
 
  • #13
Philip Land said:
"Show that the expression above satisfies it"
Yes? You are still not understanding the question correctly. The wavefunction you are given is the wavefunction corresponding to the state ##|p_0\rangle##. You need to show that the states with this type of wavefunction lead to the states satisfying the completeness relation.
 
  • #14
Orodruin said:
Yes? You are still not understanding the question correctly. The wavefunction you are given is the wavefunction corresponding to the state ##|p_0\rangle##. You need to show that the states with this type of wavefunction lead to the states satisfying the completeness relation.
Cheers. Yes the reason I ask is that I obviously don't understand it.
 
  • #15
That the wavefunction of the momentum states is ##\psi_{p_0}(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\hbar}} e^{ip_0x/\hbar}## by definition means that
$$
\langle x|p_0\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\hbar}} e^{ip_0x/\hbar}.
$$
From this and the completeness relation for ##|x\rangle##, i.e.,
$$
\int |x\rangle \langle x| dx = 1,
$$
you should be able to show the states ##|p\rangle## with the above wavefunction satisfy the completeness relation. You can do this by showing that
$$
\langle x|\psi\rangle = \int \langle x|p \rangle \langle p |\psi \rangle dp
$$
for any state ##|\psi\rangle##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K