Eigenkets/addiction of angular momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the addition of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the proof that the state |j1,j2,m1,m2> is not an eigenket of the total angular momentum operator J2. The equations provided demonstrate that while J1 and J2 have eigenkets of the form |j1,j2,m1,m2>, the term involving the dot product of angular momentum vectors introduces complications. Consequently, |j1,j2,m1,m2> does not satisfy the eigenket condition for J^2 due to the presence of raising and lowering operators, which further confirms their non-eigenket status.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with eigenstates and eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of raising and lowering operators
  • Proficiency in manipulating quantum mechanical operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of non-eigenstates in quantum systems
  • Explore the role of raising and lowering operators in angular momentum
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of J^2 and its eigenstates
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in angular momentum, and researchers exploring the mathematical foundations of quantum states.

Saxonphone
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Say we are adding angular momentum: J = J1+J2.
Now, how can i prove that J2 |j1,j2,m1,m2>[tex]\neq[/tex] [tex]\lambda[/tex] |j1j,2,m1,m2>
a.k.a. |j1j2,m1,m2> is not a eigenket of J2?


Homework Equations



J12|j1,j2,m1,m2>=j1|j1j,2,m1,m2>

J22|j1,j2,m1,m2>=j2|j1j,2,m1,m2>

J1z|j1,j2,m1,m2> = m1|j1,j2,m1,m2>

J2z|j1,j2,m1,m2> = m2|j1,j2,m1,m2>

J1=J1x+J1y+J1z

J2=J2x+J2y+J2z

Jx=J1x+J2x

Jy=J1y+J2y

Jz=J1z+J2z
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider writing out [itex]J^2[/itex] explicitly in terms of J1 and J2:

[tex]J^2=(\vec{J_1}+\vec{J_2})^2=J_1^2+J_2^2+2\vec{J_1}\cdot\vec{J_2}[/tex]

Obviously the first two terms have eigenkets of the form [itex]|j_1,j_2,m_1,m_2>[/itex], but what about that last term?

In fact that last term in [itex]J^2[/itex] can be written in terms of the z components of the angular momentum and the raising and lowering operators for angular momenta. And, [itex]|j_1,j_2,m_1,m_2>[/itex] are not eigenkets of the raising and lowering operators.

Thus, [itex]|j_1,j_2,m_1,m_2>[/itex], are not eigenkets of [itex]J^2[/itex].
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K