Eigenstates of two Coupled Harmonic Oscillator

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of finding the eigenstates and eigenenergies of two coupled quantum harmonic oscillators. Participants explore methods for diagonalizing the Hamiltonian of the system and express uncertainty regarding the representation of states in a specific subspace of the Fock space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the Hamiltonian for the coupled oscillators and expresses uncertainty about how to write the matrix in a given subspace.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of the state with one quanta of energy and suggests writing a general state as a superposition of ##|m n\rangle## states to find eigenvalues and eigenstates.
  • A participant asks for clarification on the coupling coefficient ##J## in the Hamiltonian.
  • One participant proposes using a Bogoliubov transformation to diagonalize the Hamiltonian, suggesting that this approach simplifies the problem.
  • Another participant reiterates the Bogoliubov transformation and questions how to find the matrix form of the Hamiltonian for a specific state representation.
  • A later reply notes the challenge of representing the Hamiltonian in matrix form due to the existence of infinitely many eigenstates, emphasizing the need for specific operators to define the states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the state with one quanta of energy and the utility of the Bogoliubov transformation. However, there remains uncertainty about the representation of the Hamiltonian in matrix form and the implications of having infinitely many eigenstates.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the choice of operators and the complexity of representing states in a finite matrix form due to the infinite dimensionality of the Fock space.

Esquer
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! For my quantum mechanics class I have to study the problem of two quantum oscillator coupled to each other and in particular to find the eigenstates and eigenergies for a subspace of the Fock space.
I know that, in general, to solve this kind of problem I have to diagonalize the hamiltonian of the system that in this case is the following one:
$$
H=\hbar\omega_0 (a^+a+b^+b)+\hbar J(a^+b+b^+a)
$$
with a and b bosonic creation and annhilation operator for the two harmonic oscillator.
What I do not understand is how to write the matrix in a given subspace. For example in the case of one quanta of energy present in the oscillators my two eigenstate would be: |00> a superposition of |01> and |10> (one quanta of energy in the first oscillator and 0 in the second one and viceversa). Is that correct?
I don't know how to set the problem,
thank to everyone for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you said is correct on the state with one quanta of energy.

In order to diagonalize the operator, you need to find the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the operator. To do this write a general state, which would be a superposition of ##|m n\rangle## states, then act upon this state by ##H##, and require it to be an eigenstate. Since ##H## contains creation and annihilation operator, the computation is straightforward. I am wondering, however, what is ##J## in your equation?
 
Sorry I forgot to specify, J is the coupling coefficient between the two cavities
 
Another trick is to find a canonical transformation (Bogoliubov transformation) of the annihilation operators,
$$\begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos \varphi & \sin \varphi \\
-\sin \varphi & \cos \varphi \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \alpha \\ \beta \end{pmatrix}$$
such that your Hamiltonian becomes "diagonalized",
$$H=\hbar (\omega_1 \alpha^{\dagger} \alpha + \omega_2 \beta^{\dagger} \beta).$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
vanhees71 said:
nother trick is to find a canonical transformation (Bogoliubov transformation) of the annihilation operators,
(ab)=(cosφsinφ−sinφcosφ)(αβ)​
\begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos \varphi & \sin \varphi \\ -\sin \varphi & \cos \varphi \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \alpha \\ \beta \end{pmatrix}
such that your Hamiltonian becomes "diagonalized",
H=ℏ(ω1α†α+ω2β†β).​
With that it would be actually preatty easy. But if I want to find the matrix form such $$H \begin{pmatrix} n_a \\ n_b \end{pmatrix} = E \begin{pmatrix} n_a \\ n_b \end{pmatrix}$$ what should I do?
 
Esquer said:
With that it would be actually preatty easy. But if I want to find the matrix form such $$H \begin{pmatrix} n_a \\ n_b \end{pmatrix} = E \begin{pmatrix} n_a \\ n_b \end{pmatrix}$$ what should I do?

You're not going to find that, because there will be infinitely many eigenstates of H, and the way you've written it assumes that there are just two. As vanhees71 suggested, you have to find two operators \alpha and \beta such that:
  1. H = \hbar \omega_1 \alpha^\dagger \alpha + \hbar \omega_2 \beta^\dagger \beta + C (for some constants \omega_1, \omega_2, C).
  2. \alpha \alpha^\dagger - \alpha^\dagger \alpha = 1
  3. \beta \beta^\dagger - \beta^\dagger \beta= 1
  4. \alpha \beta - \beta \alpha = \alpha^\dagger \beta - \beta \alpha^\dagger = 0
Then you can let |0\rangle be some state such that \alpha|0\rangle = \beta|0\rangle = 0. Then every state of the form (\alpha^\dagger)^n (\beta^\dagger)^m |0\rangle, which we can write as C_{nm} |n, m\rangle, for some normalization constant C_{nm}, will be an eigenstate of H, whose eigenvalues you can work out using the example of the simple harmonic oscillator. You can't represent |n,m\rangle as a column matrix unless you use infinitely many rows.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K