Eigenvalue/vector Induction Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter RickStrut95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of eigenvalues and eigenvectors, specifically showing that if \( A \cdot v = \lambda \cdot v \), then \( A^j \cdot v = \lambda^j \cdot v \) for each positive integer \( j \). The subject area is linear algebra, focusing on eigenvalue and eigenvector relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of mathematical induction as a potential method for proving the statement. There are discussions about establishing a base case and how to extend the proof to subsequent integers. Some participants question the validity of assuming the statement holds for all \( j \) based on the base case alone.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various participants contributing different perspectives on how to approach the proof. Some guidance on using induction has been suggested, but there is no explicit consensus on the method or the next steps to take.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original form of the eigenvalue equation and the need to establish a base case for the induction proof. Participants are also reflecting on their understanding of induction and its application in this context.

RickStrut95
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let A be n x n, λ ∈ ℂ, let v be n x 1, and suppose that A ⋅ v = λ ⋅ v. Show that A^jv =
mathImg.gif
^j ⋅ v
for each positive integer j.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I haven't been able to get very far but,

mathImg.gif
^j ⋅ v
- A^jv = 0n x 1
v(
mathImg.gif
^j -
A^j) = 0n x 1

Not sure how to prove that for every positive j that this is true. Any thought would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if you tried induction?
 
Where j = 0

v(
mathImg.gif
^j -
A^j) = 0n x 1

v(
mathImg.gif
^0 -
A^0) = 0n x 1

v(In-1) = 0n x 1

v ⋅ In
- v= 0n x 1

v - v = 0n x 1


Since v is n x 1

0n x 1
= 0n x 1


Because this is true I can assume this for all j?
 
I don't think so, since it would be true for just about anything raised to the zero.
Start with the original form ##Av=\lambda v ##. This is your base case.
##A^2v=A \lambda v ##.
And for any integer...
 
I see what you're saying about
RUber said:
##A^2v=A \lambda v ##.
And for any integer...
and vice-versa for
mathImg.gif
but I don't see how that helps?
My skills with induction are sub par to say the least.
 
Assume ##A^n v = \lambda^n v## show that ##A^{n+1}v=A A^n v = \lambda^{n+1}v##.
The argument for induction is: It works for j=1, assume it works for some j and show it is true for the next j.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K