Eigenvalues & Eigenvectors: Repeated vs Distinct

  • Thread starter Thread starter LikeMath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Click For Summary
For a square matrix with repeated eigenvalues, the distinctness of eigenvectors can vary. When there are n distinct eigenvalues, there are n distinct eigenvectors. However, repeated eigenvalues can lead to either multiple distinct eigenvectors or a lack thereof. The discussion illustrates this with two matrices having a double eigenvalue; one yields two independent eigenvectors, while the other results in only one independent eigenvector. Ultimately, determining the distinctness of eigenvectors requires solving for them directly.
LikeMath
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

Let A be a square matrix of order n.
It is well known that if we have n distinct eigenvalues then we surely have n distinct eigenvectors. But if there are repeated eigenvalues then the tow possibilities may happen.
My question is: How can I know that do the eigenvectors are distinct or not?

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only way to be certain is by trying to find the eigenvectors!

For example both
\begin{bmatrix}a & 0 \\ 0 & a\end{bmatrix}
and
\begin{bmatrix} a & 1 \\ 0 & a\end{bmatrix}
have a as a double eigenvalue.
To find the eigenvectors, we need to solve
\begin{bmatrix}a & 0 \\ 0 & a\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}ax \\ ay\end{bmatrix}
and
\begin{bmatrix}a & 1 \\ 0 & a\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}ax \\ ay\end{bmatrix}

The first gives the two equations ax= ax and ay= ay. Clearly, those are true for all x and y- any vector in R2 and, in particular <1, 0> and <0 1>, which are independent, are eigenvectors.

The second gives the two equations ax+ y= ax and ay= ay. The second equation is true for any y but the first equation reduces to y= 0. Given that a can be anything but we have that all eigenvectors are of the form <a, 0>, a one dimensional space so we have only one "independent" eigenvector.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K