Eigenvalues of A-adjoint and A

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the eigenvalues of a matrix \( A \) and its adjoint \( A^* \). Participants are exploring the relationship between the eigenvalues of these two matrices, particularly focusing on the assertion that the eigenvalues of \( A^* \) are the complex conjugates of the eigenvalues of \( A \).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the properties of determinants and how they relate to eigenvalues. There are attempts to manipulate the determinant equation \( \det(A - \lambda I) = 0 \) and its implications for \( A^* \). Some participants question the equality of characteristic polynomials and their relationship to eigenvalues.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the properties of determinants and eigenvalues. There is recognition of the need to differentiate between the equality of matrices and the equality of their determinants. Some participants have acknowledged misunderstandings and are refining their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for discussion. There is an emphasis on understanding the properties of complex conjugates in the context of eigenvalues and determinants.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Eigenvalues of A* and A

Show that the eigenvalues of A* are conjugates of the eigenvalues of A.

I know this is an easy problem, but I've just been spinning my wheels manipulating the equations with the transpose, conjugate, and adjoint properties.

[itex] \begin{align}<br /> <br /> A^* = \bar{A}^T\\<br /> <br /> A\vec{x} = \lambda\vec{x}\\<br /> <br /> A^*\vec{x} = \bar\lambda\vec{x}\\<br /> \end{align}<br /> [/itex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[itex]\lambda[/itex] is an eigenvalue of [itex]A[/itex] if [itex]det(A-\lambda I)=0[/itex]. Try taking conjugate and transpose on that.
 
Dick said:
[itex]\lambda[/itex] is an eigenvalue of [itex]A[/itex] if [itex]det(A-\lambda I)=0[/itex]. Try taking conjugate and transpose on that.

You know, I thought about doing it like that but didn't because I figured the other way would be easier.

[itex] \begin{align}<br /> det(A-\lambda I) = 0\\\\<br /> \overline{det(A-\lambda I)} = \bar0\\<br /> det(\overline{A-\lambda I)} = 0\\<br /> = det(\bar A-\bar\lambda I) = 0\\\\<br /> = det(\bar A-\bar\lambda I)^T = 0^T\\<br /> = det(\bar A^T-\bar\lambda I) = 0\\<br /> = det(\bar A^T-\bar\lambda I) = 0\\<br /> = det(A^*-\bar\lambda I)=0\\<br /> \\<br /> <br /> \end{align}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Just to make sure you are clear on this. [itex]A-\lambda I[/itex] is NOT EQUAL to [itex]A^* - \bar{\lambda} I[/itex]. What is equal is [itex]det(A-\lambda I)=det(A^* - \bar{\lambda} I)[/itex].
 
Dick said:
Just to make sure you are clear on this. [itex]A-\lambda I[/itex] is NOT EQUAL to [itex]A^* - \bar{\lambda} I[/itex]. What is equal is [itex]det(A-\lambda I)=det(A^* - \bar{\lambda} I)[/itex].

Yes, I know that.

The characteristic polynomials for A and A* are equal?
 
Last edited:
Shackleford said:
Yes.

The characteristic polynomials are equal?

Well, no. That's not what they are asking you to show. If A=[[1,0],[0,i]], then how does the characteristic polynomial of A compare with the characteristic polynomial of A*?
 
Dick said:
Well, no. That's not what they are asking you to show. If A=[[1,0],[0,i]], then how does the characteristic polynomial of A compare with the characteristic polynomial of A*?

I know what they're asking me. You're right. The characteristic polynomials aren't equal. I was overlooking a small detail.

The two characteristic polynomials are complex conjugates, right?

I'm not quite sure why this is true: [itex]det(A-\lambda I)=det(A^* - \bar{\lambda} I)[/itex].
 
Last edited:
Those two determinants are equal because they are both zero.
 
A. Bahat said:
Those two determinants are equal because they are both zero.

Right. Since they are complex conjugates of each other, if one equals 0 then the other equals zero.
 
  • #10
Dick said:
Right. Since they are complex conjugates of each other, if one equals 0 then the other equals zero.

Oh, okay. I didn't know the characteristic polynomials were complex conjugates of each other.

I think I have it written out more correctly now in post #3.
 
  • #11
Shackleford said:
Oh, okay. I didn't know the characteristic polynomials were complex conjugates of each other.

I think I have it written out more correctly now in post #3.

Post 3 still looks a little funny. The properties of determinant that you need are [itex]det(\bar M)=\overline{det(M)}[/itex] and [itex]det(M^T)=det(M)[/itex].
 
  • #12
Dick said:
Post 3 still looks a little funny. The properties of determinant that you need are [itex]det(\bar M)=\overline{det(M)}[/itex] and [itex]det(M^T)=det(M)[/itex].

Is it okay now?
 
  • #13
Shackleford said:
Is it okay now?

Okay. I wouldn't bother with transposing a scalar. Notice if you start with [itex]det(A-\lambda I)=c[/itex] then you wind up with [itex]det(A^*-\bar{\lambda} I)=\bar c[/itex]
 
  • #14
Dick said:
Okay. I wouldn't bother with transposing a scalar. Notice if you start with [itex]det(A-\lambda I)=c[/itex] then you wind up with [itex]det(A^*-\bar{\lambda} I)=\bar c[/itex]

Oh, you're right. I mistakenly treated it as a vector.

Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K