Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Einstein on the relativity of distance.

  1. Jul 10, 2009 #1
    I've only just begun reading about relativity, and am finding Einstein's popular level book "Relativity: The Special and General Theory" quite satisfying. This particular example, from Section X (ON THE RELATIVITY OF THE CONCEPTION OF DISTANCE) has me a bit confused, though:

    1 the first measurement being the distance between the points A' and B' on the train, judged from the train as reference body, simply by the "repeated application of the measuring-rod."

    Any hints as to why it is "by no means certain" that the distances would be the same? I'm trying to picture the setup of the example, but am having a hard time. The definition of time of an event was given as "the reading (position of the hands) of that one of these clocks2 which is in the immediate vicinity (in space) of the event."

    2 "clocks of identical construction placed at points D, E, and F of the railway line (co-ordinate system)" which were started with identical settings, simultaneously.

    I'm picturing something like an A clock and a B clock, which are stopped as points A' and B', on the train, pass by, and would have identical settings (identical times) when stop. Is that even close? I guess you'd need plenty of clocks. In any case, the distance between the could be measured, as he says, but why wouldn't they necessarily be the same distance apart as A' and B', as measured from the train as reference body?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 10, 2009 #2

    PhanthomJay

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Keep on reading...the chapter on the Lorentz Transformation MIGHT make it a bit more clear, but there are no guarantees, as the concept is quite difficult to understand. Essentially, Einstein shows that as a consequence of the constancy of the speed of light in all reference frames, regardless of their state of motion, then it follows that each person must have their own measure of distance and time as a function of their speed with respect to another reference frame. As the speed of the moving observer approaches lightspeed, the distance between and A and B on the 'stationary' embankment, which might be measured as say 1000 meters by the stationary observer, contracts to near zero as measured by the moving observer. I'll be honest: I've read that book once every year for the past 10 years, and just when I think I've understood it, I don't !
     
  4. Jul 10, 2009 #3

    JesseM

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Because each observer is measuring the distance using their own rulers, and you shouldn't rule out a priori that one observer's ruler might seem shrunk or expanded as measured by the other (as it turns out each does measure the other's ruler to be shrunk relative to their own--take at the illustration of two ruler/clock systems moving alongside each other which I posted here)
    There's a set of clocks at rest on the rails, and a different set of clocks at rest on the train. All the clocks on the train are set so they show the same reading "simultaneously" as defined by an observer at rest on the track; in section 8 he explains that he wants to define "simultaneity" for each observer in terms of the idea that they should assume that light travels at the same speed in all directions relative to themselves, so if they are standing at the exact midpoint of two clocks, the light from each clock showing a given reading (say, 1 minute 22 seconds) should reach their eyes at the same moment. Of course, as he explains in section 9, if different observers use this definition to synchronize their own clocks, then they will disagree about simultaneity--the observer on the tracks will observe the clocks on the train to be out-of-sync (when he is equidistant from two train clocks he will see them showing different times) and vice versa.

    Simultaneity is also involved in measurements of the length of moving objects--the idea is to look at the position of the front and back end of an object "at a single moment" in your frame, so if the back end is next to a clock at the 0-meter mark on your ruler when your clock attached to that mark reads 30 seconds, and the front end is next to a clock at the 10-meter mark on your ruler when the clock attached to that mark reads 30 seconds, then in your frame the moving object is 10 meters long.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Einstein on the relativity of distance.
  1. Relative distance (Replies: 1)

  2. Einstein and Relativity (Replies: 17)

Loading...