I Einstein ring and Einstein Cross

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter hongseok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy
AI Thread Summary
The appearance of Einstein rings and crosses is influenced by the mass distribution of the foreground galaxy and the alignment of the source, lens, and observer. A circularly symmetric mass distribution typically produces a ring when the source is nearly directly behind it, while an elliptical mass distribution can lead to a cross, especially when viewed edge-on. Dark matter plays a similar role in lensing as normal matter, affecting light paths and image formation. Alignment is crucial, as a perfect ring requires precise symmetry and alignment, but it cannot transform a ring into a cross. Overall, both mass distribution and alignment are essential factors in determining the observed lensing patterns.
hongseok
Messages
20
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Why does an Einstein ring sometimes appear and sometimes an Einstein Cross appear?

Some say it is due to the distribution of the mass of the galaxy in front, while others say it is due to alignment. What is right? Are both correct?

If it is due to the galaxy's mass distribution, I wonder if it can be affected by the type of galaxy and the angle between the galaxy's rotation axis and the Earth. I also wonder if the distribution of dark matter could also affect this.
Why does an Einstein ring sometimes appear and sometimes an Einstein Cross appear?

Some say it is due to the distribution of the mass of the galaxy in front, while others say it is due to alignment. What is right? Are both correct?

If it is due to the galaxy's mass distribution, I wonder if it can be affected by the type of galaxy (like an Elliptical Galaxy, Spiral galaxy) and the angle between the galaxy's rotation axis and the Earth. It's the same principle as how the shape of the dot behind the glass looks different depending on the glass model.

I also wonder if the distribution of dark matter could also affect this.
1703567869275.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You get a ring from a circularly symmetric mass distribution lensing light from an object more or less directly behind it. You get a cross (or at least you can) from an elliptical mass distribution like a galaxy seen edge on. So yes, if you have two identical disc-shaped galaxies lensing light from two identical sources, you could get a cross from one and a ring from the other depending on the orientations of the lensing galaxies.

Dark matter affects light paths the same as normal matter.
 
Ibix said:
You get a ring from a circularly symmetric mass distribution lensing light from an object more or less directly behind it. You get a cross (or at least you can) from an elliptical mass distribution like a galaxy seen edge on. So yes, if you have two identical disc-shaped galaxies lensing light from two identical sources, you could get a cross from one and a ring from the other depending on the orientations of the lensing galaxies.

Dark matter affects light paths the same as normal matter.
So, is it wrong to say that it is due to alignment?
And can I get a source for your claim?
 
hongseok said:
So, is it wrong to say that it is due to alignment?
The exact shape will depend on alignment, yes. You'll only get a perfect ring around a perfectly symmetric source perfectly aligned with a perfectly symmetric lens, but you'll get things like the ring illustration in your OP from nearly symmetric situations. I don't think alignment can turn a ring into a cross, although you can certainly have crosses from nearly symmetric situations that can be very ring-like.
hongseok said:
And can I get a source for your claim?
Which one?
 
hongseok said:
And can I get a source for your claim?
If it's just the point about alignment, all orbits around spherically symmetric sources lie in a plane. A source, a lens and an observer that are not colinear define a plane, and only light emitted in this plane can reach the observer. Light emitted in any other direction has a path that lies in a plane that doesn't include the observer. So you will get at most two images, one each side of the lens, that smear into a ring if the source, lens and observer become colinear. Thus alignment can't create a cross from a spherical lens.

Elliptical sources are harder to reason about, but there's detail here: https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~dfabricant/huchra/ay202/lectures/lecture12.pdf. If you can program in python (or anything else where someone's written a numerical integrator) you can get lensing patterns from the weak field metric for arbitrary lens mass distributions if you really want.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and hongseok
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top