Electric and magnetic field problems (curl/divergence)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving electromagnetic field problems, specifically finding a magnetic field B that satisfies the equation \(\partial_t B + \nabla \times E = 0\) given the electric field \(E(t,x,y,z) = A \cos(ky - wt) \hat{k}\). Participants clarify the use of the curl operator and the correct formulation of the matrix for calculating \(\nabla \times E\). The discussion also emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between the electric and magnetic fields, particularly the condition \(\nabla \times B = \mu_{0} \epsilon_{0} \frac{\partial E}{\partial t}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically curl and divergence operators.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory, particularly Maxwell's equations.
  • Knowledge of matrix determinants and their application in vector operations.
  • Basic understanding of wave equations in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic theory.
  • Learn about the physical significance of curl and divergence in vector fields.
  • Explore the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in wave propagation.
  • Investigate the implications of the constants \(\mu_{0}\) and \(\epsilon_{0}\) in electromagnetic equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and anyone studying wave phenomena in electric and magnetic fields.

ParoxysmX
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the electric field E(t,x,y,z) = Acos(ky-wt)k

1. Find a magnetic field such that \partial_tB + \nabla X E = 0
2. Show that \nabla . E = 0 and \nabla. B = 0
3. Find a relationship between k and w that enables these fields to satisfy

\nabla X B = \mu_{0}\epsilon_{0}\frac{\partial E}{\partial t}

The Attempt at a Solution



Really the problem here is the first one. I understand (sort of) the curl operator, but how do you find \nabla X E? Would you start with a matrix of

[i j k
0 kAcos(ky-wt) 0
0 0 Acos(ky-wt)]

Then find the determinant, which is Acos(ky-wt)(1+k)i - 0j + 0k?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that matrix is not correct. The cross product of the del operator \nabla and a vector function is just an alternate convention for denoting curl. You can why here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del#Curl. This should also explain why divergence can be denoted: \nabla \cdot

So your matrix should be: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \hat{i} &amp; \hat{j} &amp; \hat{k} \\<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial x} &amp; \frac{\partial}{\partial y} &amp; \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; {\scriptsize A\cos(ky-wt)} \end{array} \right]

The rest of the problem should be relatively trivial once you know what the operators do.
 
Last edited:
Ah I see. Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
905
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K