[Electric Charge Force] I swear I'm doing this right.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gr33nMachine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the net electrostatic force on particle 7, surrounded by six charged particles with specific charges and distances. The participants utilized Coulomb's Law, represented by the equation F = k(q1)(q2)/(r^2), where k = 8.99e9 N m²/C², and charges were defined as q1 = +8e, q2 = +8e, q3 = +e, q4 = +8e, q5 = +8e, q6 = +4e, and q7 = +4e. The initial calculations for the x and y components of the force were incorrect due to improper vector addition; the correct approach involves using the Pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude of the resultant force vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electrostatic forces
  • Familiarity with vector addition and components
  • Knowledge of the Pythagorean theorem
  • Basic proficiency in physics equations and units
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law applications in electrostatics
  • Study vector addition techniques in physics
  • Learn about the Pythagorean theorem in the context of force vectors
  • Explore examples of net force calculations in multi-charge systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric forces and charge interactions.

Gr33nMachine
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure below, six charged particles surround particle 7 at radial distances of either d = 1.0 cm or 2d, as drawn. The charges are q1 = +8e, q2 = +8e, q3 = +e, q4 = +8e, q5 = +8e, q6 = +4e, q7 = +4e, with e = 1.60 10-19 C. What is the magnitude of the net electrostatic force on particle 7?---2----
---|-----
1-7-3-4
---|-----
---5----
---|-----
---6----

Homework Equations



F = k(q1)(q2)/(r^2)
k = 8.99e9

The Attempt at a Solution



I split this up into x and y components, and then figured out the sum.

For the x, ƩF = |k(q7*q1)/(r^2) - k(q7*q3)/(r^2) - k(q7*q4)/(4(r^2))|
This simplifies to: |[k(q7)/(r^2)]*[q1-q3-q4/4]|
and so ƩF = |[4ke/(.01^2)]*e(8-1-8/4)| = 4ke/.0001*5e = 20k(e^2)/.0001

I used the same process for the y component. 2 and 5 cancel out since they have the same distance and charge, so the only charge I needed to calculate was for 6. F = k(q7)(q6)/(4(r^2))
This simplifies.. F = k(6e)(4e)/((4)(.0001)) = 6k(e^2)/.0001

Now I just have to add both components for the net charge...

Fx+Fy = 26k(e^2)/.0001 = 5.983744e-23 C

But it's wrong. And the weird thing is, when I calculate the charges separately, I get slightly different values - to different to be a simple rounding error.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You added the components together, how is that magnitude?
 
1MileCrash said:
You added the components together, how is that magnitude?

D'oh. Pythagorean Theorom then?

edit: so, ([20k(e^2)/.0001]^2 + [6k(e^2)/.0001]^2)^.5 then?
 
Yes, you found the x and y components of the net force vector. The magnitude of that vector, is what you want. You can't add those coefficients of the unit vectors- they aren't like terms.
 
Ok, so I got [436(k^2)(e^4)/(10^-8)]^.5 which comes out to 4.8055e-23. This is still incorrect...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K