Electric field in a cylindrical conductor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field in a cylindrical conductor, particularly in the context of magnetostatics and the implications of Ohm's law. Participants are examining the conditions under which the electric field is considered to be zero and the assumptions related to the geometry and properties of the conductor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the assertion that the electric field is zero everywhere, considering the role of Ohm's law and the nature of the current within the conductor. There is a discussion about whether the problem is asking for the radial electric field or the field along the wire.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and questioning the assumptions made about the electric field in relation to the current. Some guidance has been offered regarding the ideal conditions of the conductor and the implications of its length on the electric field.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific parts of the problem that ask for both the electric and magnetic fields, with participants noting the need to clarify the components being discussed. The implications of an ideal conductor versus a real conductor are also under consideration.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27

Homework Statement


Problem 1c from here: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~ingves/Teaching/TFY4240/Exam/Exam_tfy4240_Dec_2013.pdf

Homework Equations


Maxwell's equations

The Attempt at a Solution


According to the solutions, the electric field is ZERO everywhere because it's "magnetostatics" and because the net charge is zero everywhere. http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~ingves/Teaching/TFY4240/Exam/Solution_tfy4240_Dec_2013.pdf

But, in that case, what about the electric field (given by Ohm's law) which is driving the current in the first place? That one is certainly not zero. Or does it "converge to zero" since the conductor is defined to be "very long" and ohm's law gives ##\lim_{|d| \to \infty} IR = \vec{E} \cdot \vec{d} ##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nikitin said:

Homework Statement


Problem 1c from here: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~ingves/Teaching/TFY4240/Exam/Exam_tfy4240_Dec_2013.pdf

Homework Equations


Maxwell's equations

The Attempt at a Solution


According to the solutions, the electric field is ZERO everywhere because it's "magnetostatics" and because the net charge is zero everywhere. http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~ingves/Teaching/TFY4240/Exam/Solution_tfy4240_Dec_2013.pdf

But, in that case, what about the electric field (given by Ohm's law) which is driving the current in the first place? That one is certainly not zero. Or does it "converge to zero" since the conductor is defined to be "very long" and ohm's law gives ##\lim_{|d| \to \infty} IR = \vec{E} \cdot \vec{d} ##
Isn't the question asking for the radial electric field (i.e. the E-field in the x-y plane), the field driving the current would be along the wire not radially.
 
No it's asking for the Electric field ##\vec{E}(\vec{r})=\vec{E}(\vec{r_{||}})##, i.e. E as a function of radial r.
 
Nikitin said:
No it's asking for the Electric field ##\vec{E}(\vec{r})=\vec{E}(\vec{r_{||}})##, i.e. E as a function of radial r.
Part b asks for the magnetic field as a function of distance from the z-axis, where the current flows parallel to z. It then asks you to repeat the process for the electric field, which would imply it is the electric field perpendicular to the current.
In the solutions to part b, the magnetic field is given as a function of the radial component only, the question is similarly explained in the footnote at the bottom of the question page, where it states 'Obtain the electric field E(r) as a function of r||=|r|||' for the same regions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nikitin
they asked for the magnetic field as a function of radial distance. i don't think they said anything about finding the magnetic field-component perpendicular to the current.

Regardless, wouldn't the electrical field inside a conducting wire like this approach zero anyway in the limit its length going towards infinity? I mean, electrical field times length equals difference in potential, and if voltage remains constant while length diverges, then the electrical field must approach zero.
 
As the wire gets longer, the resistance R would increase, so to keep the current fixed at I, you'd have to increase the potential difference V. In the microscopic view, you'd have ##\vec{J} = \sigma\vec{E}##. Neither the current density nor the conductivity depend on the length of the wire, so ##\vec{E}## doesn't depend on the length either.

You're right that in a real wire, there'd be an electric field directed along the wire to keep the charges moving. You're supposed to use the approximation that this is an ideal conductor, so there's no resistance. Once the current is established, no electric field is needed to keep it moving.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nikitin

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K