Electric Field in Conductor w/ Infinite Length & Density ƍ

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Frank Einstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Electrodynamic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field in a specific configuration involving an infinite cylindrical conductor and a surrounding charged cylindrical shell. Participants explore the implications of Gauss's law in this context, considering the electric field and potential in the region between the conductor and the shell.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the application of Gauss's theorem in the presence of a conductor, suggesting that the electric field between the conductor and the shell may be zero due to the absence of charge in the shell.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial claim, likening the situation to a Faraday cage, but later seeks clarification on the configuration of the charged shell and the conductor.
  • There is a discussion about whether the conducting cylinder might have surface charge, leading to the assumption that the potential inside the radius of the shell would be constant.
  • A participant provides a detailed mathematical analysis, deriving the electric field and potential in the specified regions, while noting the conditions under which these results hold.
  • The mathematical approach includes the use of Gauss's law and the Poisson equation, with a focus on boundary conditions at the surfaces of the conductor and the shell.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the presence of charge and the resulting electric field, with some asserting that the electric field is zero inside the shell while others provide mathematical reasoning that leads to a more complex understanding of the potential and electric field outside the conductor. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing interpretations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the charge distribution and the nature of the conductor and shell, which may affect the conclusions drawn. There are also unresolved mathematical steps in the derivation of the electric field and potential.

Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1
Hello, I have a doubtaboutthe use of Gauss theorem in the presence of a coductor.

If I have a infinite cylindric long shell with a charge density ƍ of radius b and inside of it a cylindrical conductor of radius a, also of infinite lenght, what will be the electric field in a point located between a and b.

I think it will be zero because there is no charge into the shell, but I am nt 100% sure
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the conducting cell is infinitely long, than you're right.
This is like a Faraday cage.
 
Thanks for your anwer, I thought that some charge might be in the surface of the conductor; then I gess the potential will also be a constant inside of the radius b.
 
zoki85 said:
If the conducting cell is infinitely long, than you're right.
This is like a Faraday cage.
Wait a minute! Are we talking about the region inside an infinite cylinder of constant charge density but outside a smaller concentric conductor?
 
I think we do.
 
No, I might have said it wrong, there is a cylinder of radius a and infinite length which is a conductor and it is uncharged. there also is a cylindric shell of radius b; this one has a density of charge RO.
 
Give us the sketch Einstein. I don't trust you o0)
 
Ejemplo de teoría (evaluación continua)
Se tiene un cilindro conductor descargado de radio a y longitud infinita. Dicho
conductor está rodeado de una cáscara cilíndrica de radio b y densidad de carga
uniforme .
1) Calculad el campo electrostático en todos los puntos del espacio.
2) Calculad el potencial electrostático en todos los puntos del espacio
3) Analizad el comportamiento del campo y del potencial a grandes distancia y discutid
su significado.

This is the sketch; the best translation I can provide is:
Given an uncharged conductor cylinder of radius a and infinite lenght, said conductor is surrounded by a cylindric shell of radius b and uniform density of charge RO.
Calculate the electrostatic field in every point of space
Calculate the electrostatic totential in all points of space
Analyze the behaviour of the field and potential at big distances and discuss its meaning
 
Ok then. Everywhere inside the cylindric shell E-field =0 (as said before)
 
  • #10
Thanks again for all your help, now I only have to find a suitable point to put the orygin of potential.
 
  • #11
Just put your origin somewhere on the cylinder's axis, which we choose as the [itex]z[/itex] axis. The problem is translation invariant along this axis and under rotations around this axis. So you introduce cylinder coordinates [itex](r,\varphi,z[/itex]. I guess that the whole question is about electrostatics. Then the electric field has a potential [itex]\vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla} \Phi[/itex], and due to the symmtries this potential depends only on [itex]r[/itex].

Then Gauß's Law tells you
[tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=-\Delta \Phi=\rho. \qquad (1)[/tex]
The charge density is
[tex]\rho=\sigma \delta(\rho-b).[/tex]
The Poisson equation (1) reads for our case
[tex]\frac{1}{r} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} r} \left (r \frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi}{\mathrm{d} r} \right )=-\rho.[/tex]
Now we have nearly everywhere [itex]\rho=0[/itex]. So we solve the differential equation for [itex]\rho=0[/itex]. We simply can multiply by [itex]r[/itex] and integrate ones. This gives
[tex]r \frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi}{\mathrm{d} r}=C_1.[/tex]
Dividing by [itex]r[/itex], and integrating again gives
[tex]\Phi(r)=C_1 \ln \left (\frac{\rho}{\rho_0} \right ). \qquad(2)[/tex]
Here, I have written the second integration constant such as to make the log's argument dimensionless as it must be.

Now we need to work out the boundary conditions. First of all in the conducting inner cylinder we must have [itex]\vec{E}=0[/itex] and thus [itex]\Phi=\text{const}.[/itex] For convenience we set [itex]\Phi(r)=0[/itex] there. Now there is no charge on this inner cylinder, and the potential must be smooth on the boundary [itex]r=a[/itex]. Thus we have
[tex]\Phi(r)=0 \quad \text{for} \quad r \leq b.[/tex]
Now we must work in the surface-charge density at [itex]r=b[/itex], where according to (1) the potential must be continuous but its first derivative must jump such that the [itex]\delta[/itex] distributions singularity is correctly described. Multiplying (1) with [itex]r[/itex] and integrating wrt. [itex]r[/itex] between [itex]r=b-0^+[/itex] and [itex]r=b+0^+[/itex] yields
[tex]b \left [\Phi'(b+0^+)-\Phi'(b-0^+) \right ]=-\sigma b.[/tex]
Since [itex]\Phi'(b-0^+)=0[/itex], we must have
[tex]\Phi'(b+0^+)=-\sigma.[/tex]
Taking the derivative of our solution (2), we find
[tex]\frac{C_1}{b}=-\sigma \; \Rightarrow \; C_1=-\sigma b.[/tex]
The constant [itex]\rho_0[/itex] must be chosen such that [itex]\Phi(b)=0[/itex], i.e., [itex]\rho_0=b[/itex]. Thus our solution for the potential reads
[tex]\Phi(r)=\begin{cases}<br /> 0 & \text{for} \quad r \leq b, \\<br /> -\sigma b \ln \left (\frac{r}{b} \right ) & \text{for} \quad r>b.<br /> \end{cases}[/tex]
The electric field is
[tex]\vec{E}=-\vec{e}_r \Phi'(r)=\begin{cases}<br /> 0 & \quad \text{for} \quad r<b \\<br /> \sigma b/r \vec{e}_r & \quad \text{for} \quad r>b.<br /> \end{cases}[/tex]
Note, that the normal component of [itex]\vec{E}[/itex] which is [itex]E_r[/itex] makes the correct jump at [itex]r=b[/itex], namely the surface-charge sensity [itex]\sigma[/itex]. So we have found the complete solution of the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
564
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K