Electric field in nonmagnetic material given a magnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the electric field strength E in a nonmagnetic material given the magnetic field H = 50⋅exp(−100⋅x)⋅cos(2π⋅10⁹⋅t − 200⋅x)⋅ŷ. The user initially attempted to apply Faraday's Law but encountered issues with meaningless solutions, indicating a misunderstanding of the relationship between electric and magnetic fields. Key insights include the necessity to correct the formula for dimensional consistency and the recommendation to work with symbols before substituting numerical values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically Maxwell's equations.
  • Familiarity with Faraday's Law of electromagnetic induction.
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis in physics.
  • Experience with vector calculus and curl operations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Maxwell's equations to understand the relationship between electric and magnetic fields.
  • Study Faraday's Law in detail, focusing on its application to time-varying fields.
  • Learn about dimensional analysis and its importance in formulating physical equations.
  • Explore vector calculus techniques, particularly curl and divergence, in the context of electromagnetic fields.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those dealing with electromagnetic field theory and applications in nonmagnetic materials.

PeterV
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Electric field from magnetic field
Relevant Equations
H = 50⋅exp(−100⋅x)⋅cos(2π⋅10⁹⋅t − 200⋅x)⋅ŷ
Hello, I am stuck on a problem that I don't quite understand, which looks like this:

"Given a nonmagnetic material with the magnetic field

H = 50exp(−100⋅x)cos(2π10⁹⋅t − 200⋅x)ŷ

determine the electric field strength E"

I don't understand how I am supposed to find the solution for this problem;
I have tried using Faraday's Law, but this only gives me some weird curl vectors that give me meaningless solutions, like partial derivatives of constants and things like that, and I cannot find any relationship between these fields that actually allow me to solve for E in a sensible way.
What is it that I am missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a good exercise to figure out, whether this problem is complete, i.e., if you can reconstruct the electromagnetic field ##(\vec{E},\vec{B})## from only the given information.

First of all, you should correct the given formula, which is inacceptable, because there are dimensionful quantities in exp and cos, and the argument of the latter adds a time to a length.

Last but not least: It's way more convenient to work with symbols first and only at the very end put numbers (or physical quantities with the correction dimensions!).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
960
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K