Electric field inside a charged cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a hollow charged cylinder with charge Q on its outer surface, and the inquiry focuses on determining the electric field at a point A located on its center axis, specifically inside the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Gauss' law and its implications regarding electric flux and field contributions from differential rings. There is a consideration of how to reconcile the results from Gauss' law with the expected presence of an electric field inside the cylinder.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring the nuances of applying Gauss' law in this context, with some participants recognizing that while the electric flux is zero due to no enclosed charge, this does not imply the absence of an electric field. There is a productive exchange regarding the limitations of Gauss' law in this scenario and the need to consider contributions from the cylinder's geometry.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of symmetry and the distribution of charge, questioning the assumptions made about the electric field's behavior inside the hollow cylinder.

yoni162
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cylinder (hollow) with radius R is charged with charge Q on its outer side. What is the electric field at a point A on its center axis (inside the cylinder)?


Homework Equations


Electric field generated by a charged ring in distance r from its center
Gauss' law



The Attempt at a Solution


I seem to have misunderstood something here..I could look at a ring of width dz and calculate its contribution to the electric field at the point A on the center axis of the cylinder. This will definitely sum up to something, meaning there will be a field at point A.
On the other hand, if I use Gauss' law, I take a cylinder surface of radius r<R surrounding the center axis. Obviously Qin=0, so by conclusion the electric field in any point where r<R is 0. where's my mistake?
 

Attachments

  • cylinder.jpg
    cylinder.jpg
    11.4 KB · Views: 679
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright I think I've realized my misconception..Gauss' law in this case only tells my the the electric flux will be 0, since there is no charge inside the surface I chose..this doesn't mean that there isn't an electric field there, it just means that all contributions of flux cancel each other out, no? The electric field is there, but it cannot be calculated with Gauss' law, only directly by summing all the field contributions due to the differential rings which makw up the cylinder. Am I correct?
 
You will definitely get 0 if you use Gauss's Law due to the flux being zero. I think you can use E=k*Q*r-hat/r^2
 
yoni162 said:
Alright I think I've realized my misconception..Gauss' law in this case only tells my the the electric flux will be 0, since there is no charge inside the surface I chose..this doesn't mean that there isn't an electric field there, it just means that all contributions of flux cancel each other out, no? The electric field is there, but it cannot be calculated with Gauss' law, only directly by summing all the field contributions due to the differential rings which makw up the cylinder. Am I correct?
Yes, your thinking is correct. Gauss' law always applies, but it's not always helpful. It's helpful when symmetry tells you that the field along the surface is uniform, but that's not the case here. Here the field is different near the ends of the cylinder compared to the middle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
966
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K