Electric field of an electric dipole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating that the electric field of an electric dipole is irrotational, specifically showing that the curl of the electric field, represented as \(\nabla \times \mathbf{E}\), equals zero. The electric field components in both spherical and Cartesian coordinates were provided, with initial calculations suggesting a non-zero curl in Cartesian coordinates. However, upon using the Simplify command in Mathematica, it was confirmed that the curl is indeed zero in both coordinate systems, validating the conservative nature of the electrostatic field for an electric dipole.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipole moment (p)
  • Knowledge of electrostatics and conservative fields
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically curl operations
  • Experience with Mathematica for symbolic computation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of electric dipoles in electrostatics
  • Learn about vector calculus operations, focusing on curl and divergence
  • Explore the use of Mathematica for simplifying vector fields
  • Investigate the implications of irrotational fields in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, vector calculus, and computational physics using tools like Mathematica.

Emanuel84
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Since the electrostatic field is conservative, show that it is irrotational for an electric dipole, whose dipole momentum is p.

Homework Equations


\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the components of the electric field in spherical coordinates are:

E_r = \frac{2 p \cos \theta}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3}

E_\theta = \frac{p \sin \theta}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3}

E_\phi = 0

so applying the curl is just a matter of calculus, and it's easy to show that
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = 0.

Otherwise, using cartesian coordinates, if I choose the z-axis oriented as the dipole and set the origin in the dipole's center, the components of the electric field are:

E_x = \frac{p}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{3 x z}{r^5}

E_y = \frac{p}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{3 y z}{r^5}

E_z = \frac{p}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left( \frac{3z^2}{r^5} - \frac{1}{r^3} \right)

and the curl is different from 0, as one can easily prove, in contradiction with the previous result!

So, my question is:

Did I mistake or miss something? I really can't see what's wrong with this problem, at this time.. :rolleyes:

Thank you. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a quick computation I made with Mathematica regarding this problem.

As you can clearly see, in one case the curl is 0, in the second one is different from 0.
 

Attachments

I finally realized Mathematica didn't do all the simplifications! :smile:

By using Simplify command it comes up that curl(E)=(0,0,0) even in cartesian coordinates, as it should be.

Thank you, anyway!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K