What is the Electric Field on a Metallic Surface in an Electrostatic Field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the electric field on a metallic surface placed in an electrostatic field using Gauss's Law. The correct expression for the electric field, E, on the surface is established as E = σ/ε, where σ represents the surface charge density and ε is the permittivity of free space. The analysis includes calculating the total surface area of a cylindrical Gaussian surface, but emphasizes that only the circular areas contribute to the electric field due to the nature of the electric field lines being parallel to the surface. The discussion also references the behavior of electric fields in a parallel plate capacitor for further clarification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law and its application in electrostatics.
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and surface charge density.
  • Basic knowledge of cylindrical coordinates and geometry.
  • Concept of electric fields in parallel plate capacitors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields using Gauss's Law in various geometries.
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields in parallel plate capacitors.
  • Explore the concept of surface charge density and its implications in electrostatics.
  • Investigate the relationship between electric potential and electric field in capacitors.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, electrical engineering professionals, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and electric field behavior in conductive materials.

Sixty3
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A metallic surface is placed in an electrostatic field. Derive an expression for the electric field on the metal surface.

Homework Equations


\oint \underline{E} \cdot d\underline{A}=\dfrac{q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}

The Attempt at a Solution


My initial thought was to set up a cylindrical Gaussian surface, I've tried to show it in the picture attachment.
s1sz2r.png

Then the dA facing downwards will be 0 since the electric field within the metal is 0, and the 'side' of the cylinder dA is perpendicular to the electric field and also 0. So the only contribution is the upward facing circular area. Letting Δh→0, it gives the electric field on the surface, EA=q/ε, and q/A=σ the surface charge density. So E=σ/ε.

Is this method correct, I'm not entirely sure to be honest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks a bit like you're overthinking it. All that matters is the total surface area of this cylinder in this case.

So, how could you calculate the total surface area?

Well, you've got two circles at each end of the cylinder, so that surface area would be two times the area of a circle.
$$A_{1} = 2\pi r^2$$

For the second part of calculating the surface area, it would just be the total length of your cylinder times the length, ##l##, of the cylinder.
$$A_{2} = 2\pi r l$$

Total surface area:
$$SA = A_{1}+A_{2}$$

Plugging into Gauss's Law and simplifying yields:
$$E = \frac {2 k_{c} q_{enc}}{r(l+r)
}$$

Note that $$k_{c} = \frac {1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}$$ so this is how the ##k_{c}## appeared.
 
The total field is the sum of the external applied field plus the field due to the charge on the surface of the metal. Inside the metal the fields are in opposite direction and cancel. Outside they are in the same direction and add up.
 
Rellek said:
Looks a bit like you're overthinking it. All that matters is the total surface area of this cylinder in this case.

So, how could you calculate the total surface area?

Well, you've got two circles at each end of the cylinder, so that surface area would be two times the area of a circle.
$$A_{1} = 2\pi r^2$$

For the second part of calculating the surface area, it would just be the total length of your cylinder times the length, ##l##, of the cylinder.
$$A_{2} = 2\pi r l$$

Total surface area:
$$SA = A_{1}+A_{2}$$

Plugging into Gauss's Law and simplifying yields:
$$E = \frac {2 k_{c} q_{enc}}{r(l+r)
}$$

Note that $$k_{c} = \frac {1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}$$ so this is how the ##k_{c}## appeared.

That solution is not correct. The side area does not contribute because the field is parallel to the surface.
 
Imagine a parallel plate capacitor with potential V across the plates, and you slide a plate inbetween the plates. What is the E field before & after sliding the plate?

(You can use 5 Gaussian surfaces to derive 6 equations in 6 unknowns; the last equation has to do with the voltage V).
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
830
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K