Electric Field Strength Inside a Cylindrical Non-conductor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field strength within a cylindrical non-conducting shell, specifically focusing on determining the radial depth at which the electric field equals half of its surface value. The problem is drawn from a physics textbook and involves concepts related to charge distribution and electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply shell theorems and equations for point charges to solve the problem, but expresses confusion regarding their application to cylindrical symmetry. Some participants question the validity of using shell theorems in this context and clarify the differences between spherical and cylindrical charge distributions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the shell theorem as it applies to cylindrical geometries. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Gauss' law, which is suggested to be more appropriate for this scenario.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the symmetry of the problem, as the original poster initially conflates spherical and cylindrical charge distributions. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in applying theorems correctly based on the geometry involved.

clementc
Messages
38
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey everyone,
I'm just studying some physics, and came across this question where I don't know why I'm wrong =(
It's from Physics (5th Ed.) by Halliday, Resnick and Krane - Chapter 27, Exercise 22
Positive charge is distributed uniformly throughout a long, nonconducting, cylindrical shell of inner radius [tex]R[/tex] and outer radius [tex]2R[/tex]. At what radial depth beneath the outer surface of the charge distribution is the electric field strength equal to one half the surface value?
Here's a diagram I drew of my interpretation. It's the side on view:

[PLAIN]http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/613/cylinder.png

I did it using the shell theorems (HRK says they work for cylinders) and the equation for an electric field for a point charge.


Homework Equations


For this question, all I used was:
[tex]\rho = \frac{q}{V}[/tex]
[tex]E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2}[/tex]
And also a bit of shell theory

The Attempt at a Solution


Let the charge in the entire cylindrical shell be [tex]q[/tex].
[tex]\rho=\frac{q}{V}=\frac{q}{lA}[/tex] where [tex]\rho[/tex] is the volume charge density.
At the outermost surface, using the shell theorems, I treated all the charge as being at the centre of the cylinder.
[tex]\therefore E=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q}{(2R)^2}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{\rho l\pi(4R^2-R^2)}{4R^2}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{3\rho l}{16\epsilon_0}[/tex]

To get where the E field is half of this, I solve for half this strength at a distance [tex]x[/tex] from the centre:
[tex]E=\frac{3\rho l}{32\epsilon_0}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{\rho l\pi(x^2-R^2)}{x^2}[/tex]

[tex]\therefore \frac{3}{32}=\frac{x^2-R^2}{4x^2}[/tex]

[tex]12x^2=32(x^2-R^2)[/tex]

[tex]3x^2 = 8x^2 - 8R^2[/tex]

[tex]5x^2 = 8R^2[/tex]

[tex]\therefore x = R\sqrt{\frac{8}{5}}[/tex]

[tex]Depth = R(2-\sqrt{\frac{8}{5}}) = 0.735R[/tex]

But the answer was [tex]0.557R[/tex] beneath the surface, and they used Gauss' law. However, I still don't see where I went wrong. I think the shell theorems still hold instead a cylindrical shell, but I'm not sure.

Could anyone please help me? =(
Thank you very much guys
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
clementc said:
I did it using the shell theorems (HRK says they work for cylinders) and the equation for an electric field for a point charge.
What do you mean by 'shell theorems'? Note that this problem has cylindrical symmetry, not spherical symmetry.

Homework Equations


For this question, all I used was:
[tex]\rho = \frac{q}{V} \\<br /> E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2}[/tex]
And also a bit of shell theory
:confused:
 
Oh shell theorem
=D
what i meant was the one which like tells you that if you have a uniformly charged spherical/round surface
1. from outside, the electric field is the same as if all the charge were concentrated at a point in the centre
2. the electric field inside the shell is 0

so when I am like at point x, i can ignore all the charge outside and the electric field experienced is that which arises only from the charge inside that circle of radius x
 
clementc said:
1. from outside, the electric field is the same as if all the charge were concentrated at a point in the centre
OK, but for a cylinder that means you can treat the charge as if it were concentrated along a line at the center, not a point.
 
OH LOL OF COURSE! *bangs head on table*
im such a dummy =P
thank you so much doc Al thank you thank you thank you =D
in that case gauss' law is much nicer heh
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
785
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K