Electric fields between point charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the convention of referencing angles in relation to the positive x-axis rather than the y-axis when analyzing electric fields between point charges. Participants emphasize the need for clarity in terminology, suggesting that the phrase "angle from the line AP" is more accurate than "to the line AP." This focus on precision in language highlights the importance of standard conventions in physics. The repeated mention of these points underscores a shared understanding of the conventions used in vector analysis. Overall, the conversation reflects a commitment to clear communication in scientific discussions.
AliTheAlienTV
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Member warned that we strongly discourage images of the problem statement and work done.
Homework Statement
Question 2c: I've attempted the question, I've got the magnitude right but I got the angle wrong. I don't understand why the value of the components are swapped around.
Relevant Equations
Electric fields
Screenshot_2023-03-27-12-52-14-096_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
Screenshot_2023-03-16-15-07-14-513-edit_com.android.chrome.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
 
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
 

Attachments

  • 16799522405956579565208424762276.jpg
    16799522405956579565208424762276.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 96
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top