Electric fields between point charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the convention of referencing angles in relation to the positive x-axis rather than the y-axis when analyzing electric fields between point charges. Participants emphasize the need for clarity in terminology, suggesting that the phrase "angle from the line AP" is more accurate than "to the line AP." This focus on precision in language highlights the importance of standard conventions in physics. The repeated mention of these points underscores a shared understanding of the conventions used in vector analysis. Overall, the conversation reflects a commitment to clear communication in scientific discussions.
AliTheAlienTV
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Member warned that we strongly discourage images of the problem statement and work done.
Homework Statement
Question 2c: I've attempted the question, I've got the magnitude right but I got the angle wrong. I don't understand why the value of the components are swapped around.
Relevant Equations
Electric fields
Screenshot_2023-03-27-12-52-14-096_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
Screenshot_2023-03-16-15-07-14-513-edit_com.android.chrome.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
 
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
 

Attachments

  • 16799522405956579565208424762276.jpg
    16799522405956579565208424762276.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 95
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
PhDeezNutz said:
I’m guessing it’s just convention to reference the angle from the positive x-axis instead of the y-axis.

To nitpick your solution should say “angle from the line AP” not “to the line AP”
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top