Electric Fields of Cylinders and Cylindrical Shells

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating electric fields using Gauss' Law for a cylindrical shell and a metal cylinder. The electric field at a radius of 5.0 cm from the z-axis was calculated to be -7.1901E4 N/C, while at 8.0 cm, the total electric field was determined to be -3.1176E4 N/C after accounting for contributions from both the insulator and the metal. The surface charge density σmetal on the outer surface of the metal cylinder was computed to be -2.7527E-5 C/m² using the formula σ=Q*A. Participants provided feedback on the calculations and formatting issues related to LaTeX.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law and its application in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field calculations for cylindrical geometries
  • Knowledge of surface charge density concepts
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric fields using Gauss' Law for different geometries
  • Explore the implications of surface charge density in electrostatics
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields inside conductive and insulating materials
  • Practice formatting mathematical expressions in LaTeX for clarity in presentations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving electrostatic problems related to cylindrical structures.

tristanm
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Use Gauss' Law to calculate the electric field at a radius of 5.0cm from the z-axis
2. Use Gauss' Law to calculate the electric field at a radius of 8.0cm from the z-axis
3. What is the surface charge density σmetal on the outer surface of the metal cylinder?


Homework Equations


∫EdA = \frac{Q<sub>Enclosed</sub>}{ε<sub>o</sub>}
σ=Q*A
A=2πrL
ρ=\frac{Q<sub>insulator</sub>}{ε<sub>o</sub>(c<sup>2</sup>-b<sup>2</sup>)L}

lwA7Yot.png


The Attempt at a Solution


1. Using Gauss' law, I took E and A out of the integral as they are both in the same direction, moved A over to the RHS of the equation, and subbed in 2πrL to give \frac{Q<sub>enclosed</sub>}{ε<sub>o</sub>2πrL}
I then put in the values in meters, μCs and got -7.1901E4N/C

2. E of the insulator is equal to \frac{Q<sub>enclosed</sub>}{ε<sub>o</sub>} which is equal to \frac{ρπ(r<sup>2</sup>-b<sup>2</sup>)L}{2ε<sub>o</sub>r}
which gives the result of 4.0724E4N/C
Adding this value to Emetal I get -3.1176E4N/C

I'm not sure whether or not this is the correct procedure to calculate the electric field inside the shell's material, however for part 1. I know that inside the shell it has no electric field.

3. Is this just a matter of using σ=Q*A where Q is the charge of the metal and A is (2πr2 + 2πrl)?
I did this and got -2.7527E-5


Aside: Why are my [/itex] formatting not working?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tristanm said:
Why are my [/itex] formatting not working?

Because you put non-LaTeX controls (sub, /sub) inside. Use _{} etc.:
\frac{Q_{Enclosed}}{ε_o}
 
haruspex said:
Because you put non-LaTeX controls (sub, /sub) inside. Use _{} etc.:
\frac{Q_{Enclosed}}{ε_o}

That makes sense. I can't seem to edit my post for some reason, but no matter.

What about the actual physics question?
 
tristanm said:
That makes sense. I can't seem to edit my post for some reason, but no matter.

What about the actual physics question?

Sorry for the delay - sporadic internet access.
For 1, the formula looks ok - haven't checked the numbers.
For 2, you seem to be missing some terms in the denominator (like those in your equation for 1). You've also missed out some algebraic steps in getting to the numerical result. If you post all your algebra I'm happy to check that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Sorry about replying so late. I did in fact figure it out! Thank you for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K