Electric Flux Through a Hole in a Sphere?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric flux through a drilled hole in a nonconductive hollow sphere surrounding a point charge. The charge of 11.0 µC is located at the origin, and the sphere has a radius of 12.0 cm with a drilled hole of 1.00 mm radius. The correct formula for total electric flux through a sphere is established as 4*k*q*pi, while the flux through the hole is derived by multiplying the electric field strength by the area of the hole, adjusted by the ratio of the radii squared. This highlights the importance of understanding the geometric implications of flux calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric flux and Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with the concept of electric field strength
  • Knowledge of surface area calculations for spheres
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gauss's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations for point charges
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of electric flux
  • Investigate the effects of different shapes of apertures on electric flux
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding electric flux calculations in nonconductive materials.

PosteMortem
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An uncharged nonconductive hollow sphere of radius 12.0 cm surrounds a 11.0 µC charge located at the origin of a cartesian coordinate system. A drill with a radius of 1.00 mm is aligned along the z axis, and a hole is drilled in the sphere. Calculate the electric flux through the hole.

Homework Equations


Flux=EA

The Attempt at a Solution


I've got the solution for this problem. I found the flux for the sphere to be equal to (kq/r^2)*(pi*r^2)=k*q*pi, and after multiplying that value by the ratio of the smaller radius squared to the larger radius squared, I got the answer. However, I was reading the textbook, and it shows the flux through a sphere to be equal to 4*k*q*pi, the reason being that integrating over the entire surface will give us the surface area of a sphere. I'm confused as to how these two answers could be different. Shouldn't it be the same in both cases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check the units of each. One is a flux, the other a field strength.

What motivated you multiply the electric field strength by ##\pi r^2##? It provided a correction factor, but it seems geometrically unmotivated at first glance (at least to me). A bit of algebra shows that it will work if you use the ratio of radii squared as a multiplier to select the amount of flux, but one is the radius of a volume and the other a radius of an area. Not exactly intuitive. Nothing succeeds like success, I suppose! But what would you have done if the hole happened to be a square punched in the surface?

When you start with the total flux over a spherical surface and want to know the flux that comes through some small aperture at the surface you multiply the total flux by the ratio of the total surface area to the area of the aperture.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K