Electric Flux Units: Understanding the Confusion | Explanation Included

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric flux and its units, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding the relationship between electric field strength, surface area, and the definition of electric flux. Participants are exploring the implications of these definitions in the context of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the definition of electric flux as the number of electric field lines through a surface area and questioning how this relates to the units of Nm²/C. There is a discussion about the interpretation of electric field strength as the density of field lines per unit area and how this affects the understanding of flux.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging in clarifying the definitions and units involved in electric flux. There is a recognition of differing interpretations of the relationship between electric field strength and surface area, with some suggesting that the visualization of field lines may not directly correlate with standard units. The conversation appears to be productive, with participants offering insights and questioning assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the absence of area in the standard units of electric field strength and how this relates to their understanding of electric flux. There is also mention of visualizing field lines, which may contribute to the misunderstanding of the concept.

Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
Units for electric flux is Nm2/C = (electric Field Strength)(Surface Area).

However the units of electric flux are confusing because I though the definition of Electric flux was

The number of electric field lines through an area of surface. Therefore I though Electric flux would have had units of (Surface Area)/(Electric Field Strength).

Please look in paint doc for my reasoning.
1.Black square is a plane of area da
2.Red square = Portion of plane that one E-Field Vector covers = da/n = (Integer value) where n>1

Side Note: Reason why I made da/n = Integer was because I wanted to make sure that a fraction of an E-Vect was not passing through da which would mean that the other fraction of the same E-Vect would remain outside da ( or Not passing through da) (Not sure if that matters though).

**3.Each Field vector passing through da has equal magnitude.

4. Rest of explanation is in paint doc.

Clearly my understanding is off. Can someone please help me understand. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • EVECT.png
    EVECT.png
    13.1 KB · Views: 539
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Miike012 said:
However the units of electric flux are confusing because I though the definition of Electric flux was

The number of electric field lines through an area of surface. Therefore I though Electric flux would have had units of (Surface Area)/(Electric Field Strength).
The electric field strength (the field) can be thought of as the number of field lines per unit area. So, flux (number of field lines) = (Electric Field Strength) x (Surface Area).

Please look in paint doc for my reasoning.
1.Black square is a plane of area da
2.Red square = Portion of plane that one E-Field Vector covers = da/n = (Integer value) where n>1
**3.Each Field vector passing through da has equal magnitude.
The field is uniform, thus the number of field lines per unit area is uniform. The total flux would be E*da.
 
Doc Al said:
The field is uniform, thus the number of field lines per unit area is uniform. The total flux would be E*da.

I know that I just created an example to explain to you why I thought the units of E-flux should be (Mag of E-Field entering surface)/(surface Area).
I wasn't interested in the equation only the units.
 
Doc Al said:
The electric field strength (the field) can be thought of as the number of field lines per unit area

I would have never known that by the electric field equation which has units of N/c = Vm... No where in the units do you see units for area...
 
I suppose intuitively that I could think of the E-field as number of field lines per area as you explained it because the stronger the E-Field the more condensed the field lines would be therefore taking up less area at a certain distance from the source of the E-Field compared to a weaker E-field at the same distance from the source producing the weaker field.
 
Miike012 said:
I suppose intuitively that I could think of the E-field as number of field lines per area as you explained it because the stronger the E-Field the more condensed the field lines would be therefore taking up less area at a certain distance from the source of the E-Field compared to a weaker E-field at the same distance from the source producing the weaker field.
Exactly.

Realize that field lines are just a way to help visualize things. They don't really exist! What exists is the field, which has a value everywhere.
 
Miike012 said:
I would have never known that by the electric field equation which has units of N/c = Vm... No where in the units do you see units for area...
As I said in my last post, 'field lines' are just tools for visualization. Thus you won't see 'lines' or area in any standard units for field.

The standard unit for flux isn't 'number of lines' but E*Area = Nm2/C.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K