Electric motors vs internal combustion engines

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Electric motors have a higher power-to-weight ratio compared to internal combustion engines (ICE), but ICEs typically offer a superior energy-to-weight ratio when considering fuel. A Tesla has demonstrated its performance capabilities by beating a Lamborghini in a drag race, winning 2 out of 3 runs. The weight of the battery pack in electric vehicles (EVs) is significantly higher than the weight of fuel in ICEs, which affects overall performance and range. The discussion highlights the advantages and disadvantages of both technologies in terms of weight and energy efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power-to-weight ratio concepts
  • Familiarity with electric vehicle (EV) technology
  • Knowledge of internal combustion engine (ICE) mechanics
  • Basic principles of drag racing and vehicle performance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Tesla Model X performance specifications
  • Explore advancements in electric motor technology
  • Investigate the energy density of various fuels compared to battery technologies
  • Learn about the design and engineering of electric drag racing vehicles
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, electric vehicle enthusiasts, performance car aficionados, and anyone interested in the comparative analysis of electric motors and internal combustion engines.

Tabaristiio
Messages
61
Reaction score
2
On average, which has higher power to weight ratio between the two? So on average, if both weighed the same, which one is going to have more power?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
An electric motor has more power to weight
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
But an internal combustion engine plus a tank of fuel usually has more energy to weight ratio than an electric motor plus battery.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, gmax137 and Vanadium 50
anorlunda said:
But an internal combustion engine plus a tank of fuel usually has more energy to weight ratio than an electric motor plus battery.

By a huge factor. My battery pack weighs 275 pounds, but my fuel weighs 60 - and will take the car 20x farther. Indeed, the battery pack and the engine weigh about the same, and the motor and the gas weigh about the same.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
By a huge factor. My battery pack weighs 275 pounds, but my fuel weighs 60 - and will take the car 20x farther. Indeed, the battery pack and the engine weigh about the same, and the motor and the gas weigh about the same.
True, though the 'fuel' portion gets on the scale with quite a bit of a necessary baggage that the EV portion does not need: fuel n water pumps, fuel and oil and air filters, carburation or fuel injection, exhaust system, high power heat rejection, starter system, multi gear transmission, differential. Last, the ICE itself is perhaps double or triple the mass of the E motor (4x in your case?).
 
The OP gave no clues as to context. We speculate when we think he means vehicles.
 
cosmik debris said:
But can it beat it in two races?

Cheers
It did. It was a best of three runs. 2:1 to the Tesla.
 
  • #10
CWatters said:
It did. It was a best of three runs. 2:1 to the Tesla.

If it was done without recharging then it is a better result. You see incredible times for some electric vehicles but they can only do one run.

Cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K