Tabaristiio
- 61
- 2
On average, which has higher power to weight ratio between the two? So on average, if both weighed the same, which one is going to have more power?
The discussion centers on comparing the power to weight ratio of electric motors versus internal combustion engines (ICE), particularly in the context of vehicles. Participants explore various aspects such as energy density, performance in racing scenarios, and the implications of weight from fuel versus battery systems.
Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are competing views regarding the power to weight and energy to weight ratios of electric motors versus internal combustion engines. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple perspectives presented.
Participants note the lack of context in the original question, which may influence the interpretations and comparisons being made.
anorlunda said:But an internal combustion engine plus a tank of fuel usually has more energy to weight ratio than an electric motor plus battery.
True, though the 'fuel' portion gets on the scale with quite a bit of a necessary baggage that the EV portion does not need: fuel n water pumps, fuel and oil and air filters, carburation or fuel injection, exhaust system, high power heat rejection, starter system, multi gear transmission, differential. Last, the ICE itself is perhaps double or triple the mass of the E motor (4x in your case?).Vanadium 50 said:By a huge factor. My battery pack weighs 275 pounds, but my fuel weighs 60 - and will take the car 20x farther. Indeed, the battery pack and the engine weigh about the same, and the motor and the gas weigh about the same.
CWatters said:A Tesla recently beat a Lambo in a drag race.
http://mashable.com/2017/08/21/tesla-model-x-vs-lamborghini-aventador/#bNjfV3Ep3Pqy
It did. It was a best of three runs. 2:1 to the Tesla.cosmik debris said:But can it beat it in two races?
Cheers
CWatters said:It did. It was a best of three runs. 2:1 to the Tesla.