Electric potential due to a solid sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential due to a uniformly charged solid sphere, specifically addressing problem 2.21 from Griffiths' textbook on electrodynamics. The original poster seeks to find the potential both inside and outside the sphere, using infinity as a reference point, and to compute the gradient of the potential in each region.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply different formulas for calculating electric potential, including an integral involving charge density and the distance to the charge elements. They express confusion regarding the integration process and the volume element used in the calculations.
  • Some participants question the definitions and symbols used in the equations, particularly regarding the volume element and the variable representing distance from the origin.
  • Others suggest clarifying the notation to avoid confusion between the position of the point where the potential is being calculated and the position of the charge elements.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various aspects of the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the correct volume element and notation, but there is no explicit consensus on the resolution of the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem as stated in the textbook, and there are indications of potential misunderstandings regarding the mathematical setup and notation. The original poster's calculations appear to have inconsistencies that are being addressed through collaborative discussion.

Marcus Nielsen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
Hello Guys! This is my first post so bear with me. I am currently studying the basics of electrostatics using the textbook "Introduction to electrodynamics 3 edt. - David J. Griffiths". My problem comes when i try to solve problem 2.21.

Find the potential V inside and outside a uniformly charged solid sphere whose radius is R and whose total charge is q. Use infinity as your reference point. Compute the gradient of V in each region, and check that it yields the correct field. Sketch V(r).

Using the equation V(r) = \int\limits_O^r \boldsymbol{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{l} and Gauss law \oint \boldsymbol{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{a} = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}, I can solve the problem and get the same answer as in this guide http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/08/electric-potential-examples/ first example. But my problem appears when I want to use the formula V(\boldsymbol{r})= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\boldsymbol{r'})}{\eta} \mathrm{d}\tau' where \boldsymbol{\eta} = \boldsymbol{r}-\boldsymbol{r}' as defined in Griffiths textbook.

This is my calculation using the last formula.

We got a solid sphere with radius R and total charge q, therefore \rho = \frac{q}{\frac{4}{3} \pi R^3}

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> V &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\boldsymbol{r&#039;})}{\eta} \mathrm{d}\tau&#039; \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int\limits^{2 \pi}_0 \int\limits^{\pi}_{0} \int\limits^{R}_0 \frac{\rho}{\sqrt{r^2+z^2-2rz \cos(\theta)}} \sin(\theta) \ \mathrm{d}r \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \mathrm{d}\phi<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Using substitution <br /> g =r^2+z^2-2rz \cos(\theta) \longrightarrow \mathrm{d}\theta = \frac{1}{2rz \sin(\theta)} \mathrm{d}g<br />
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> V &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int\limits^{2 \pi}_0 \int\limits^{g(\pi)}_{g(0)} \int\limits^{R}_0 \frac{\rho}{2rz\sqrt{g}} \ \mathrm{d}r \ \mathrm{d}g \ \mathrm{d}\phi\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} 2 \pi \int\limits^R_0 \int\limits^{g(\pi)}_{g(0)} \frac{\rho}{2rz \sqrt{g}} \ \mathrm{d}g \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \epsilon_0} \int\limits^R_0 \int\limits^{g(\pi)}_{g(0)} \frac{\rho}{rz \sqrt{g}} \ \mathrm{d}g \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \epsilon_0} \int\limits^R_0 \frac{2\rho}{rz} \Big[ \sqrt{g} \Big]^{g(\pi)}_{g(0)} \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \epsilon_0} \int\limits^R_0 \frac{2\rho}{rz} \Big( \sqrt{r^2+z^2+2rz} - \sqrt{r^2+z^2-2rz} \Big) \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \epsilon_0} \int\limits^R_0 \frac{2\rho}{rz} \Big( \sqrt{(r+z)^2} - \sqrt{(r-z)^2} \Big) \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> \end{align*}<br />
At this stage I am a bit confused, the r will cancel out and i will be left with 1/r which will turn out to ln(r) after integration, does anyone know what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marcus Nielsen said:
Hello Guys! This is my first post so bear with me. I am currently studying the basics of electrostatics using the textbook "Introduction to electrodynamics 3 edt. - David J. Griffiths". My problem comes when i try to solve problem 2.21.

Find the potential V inside and outside a uniformly charged solid sphere whose radius is R and whose total charge is q. Use infinity as your reference point. Compute the gradient of V in each region, and check that it yields the correct field. Sketch V(r).

Using the equation V(r) = \int\limits_O^r \boldsymbol{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{l} and Gauss law \oint \boldsymbol{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{a} = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}, I can solve the problem and get the same answer as in this guide http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/08/electric-potential-examples/ first example. But my problem appears when I want to use the formula V(\boldsymbol{r})= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\boldsymbol{r&#039;})}{\eta} \mathrm{d}\tau&#039; where \boldsymbol{\eta} = \boldsymbol{r}-\boldsymbol{r}&#039; as defined in Griffiths textbook.

This is my calculation using the last formula.

We got a solid sphere with radius R and total charge q, therefore \rho = \frac{q}{\frac{4}{3} \pi R^3}

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> V &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\boldsymbol{r&#039;})}{\eta} \mathrm{d}\tau&#039; \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int\limits^{2 \pi}_0 \int\limits^{\pi}_{0} \int\limits^{R}_0 \frac{\rho}{\sqrt{r^2+z^2-2rz \cos(\theta)}} \sin(\theta) \ \mathrm{d}r \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \mathrm{d}\phi<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Is the volume element really sin(θ) dθ dΦ dr?
What is z?
 
Last edited:
Oh there is actually missing a r^2. Due to Griffiths book the volume element is given by the formula \mathrm{d} \tau = r^2 \sin(\theta) \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \mathrm{d}\phi \ \mathrm{d}r.
 
Marcus Nielsen said:
Oh there is actually missing a r^2. Due to Griffiths book the volume element is given by the formula \mathrm{d} \tau = r^2 \sin(\theta) \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \mathrm{d}\phi \ \mathrm{d}r.
Yes, but you integrate with respect to r'. You have to use different symbols for the position of the point r where you want to determine the potential, and the position of the charge element r' inside the sphere. And what is z?
 
19679579_10213964056523381_1499090821_n.jpg

So z is the distance from the origin to the point where I want to know the potential. The shown figure above is made for a shell, so the small rectangle should be a small volume element. And the angle \theta&#039; is what I call \theta
 
Aarh I see. I am actually confusing my self by avoiding the ' symbol. Thanks I will try again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
764
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K