Electric Potential Energy of Point Charge Systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the electric potential energy of a system involving two charges, -Qo and +Q3, and the movement of +Q3 towards -Qo. The initial and final electric potential energies were calculated, leading to confusion over the correct answer between options C and D. It was clarified that options C and D pertain specifically to the interaction between -Qo and +Q3, not the entire three-charge system. The misinterpretation of the question and the assumption that all charges have the same magnitude contributed to the misunderstanding. Ultimately, the correct answer is D, indicating that the electric potential energy of the system decreases as +Q3 is moved closer to -Qo.
flyonthewall
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Two point charges of opposite sign, - Qo and +Qo, are fixed in place a distance D apart from each other, as shown in the figure, while a third point charge with positive charge + Q3 is initially located a long distance away on the line joining
- Qo and + Qo. An external force moves point charge +Q3 along the line until it is in its final position a distance D to the right of +Qo. Which of the following claims is true during the time that point charge + Q 3 is being moved from its initial position to its final position?

A) The work done by point charge +Qo on point charge +Q3 is positive.
B) The work done by the external force on point charge +Q3 is zero.
C) The electric potential energy of the (-Qo) (+Q3) system becomes higher.
D) The electric potential energy of the (-Qo)(+Q3) system becomes lower.
Relevant Equations
Ue = (kq1q2) / r
Here is my line of thinking:
I know A and B aren't correct since the work done would be negative since the electric force and displacement are in opposite directions. When calculating the electric potential energies to consider options C and D, I thought the initial electric potential energy of the system was -(kQ^2)/D and the final electric potential energy was the sum of the three pairs of electric potential energy so it would be -(kQ^2)/d + (kQ^2)/d - (kQ^2)/2D which simplifies to -(kQ^2) / 2D. Since the final electric potential energy would be a smaller negative, I chose option C, that the electric potential of the system would increase (which also seemed to make sense to me intuitively since the two positive charges are brought closer together which they don't "like" so there potential energy would increase). The correct answer is D though and I can't quite understand what I'm messing up on because the problem itself doesn't seem that challenging. Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to PF!

Note that part (C) is referring to the potential energy of the system consisting of only the two charges (-Qo) and (+Q3). It is not referring to the potential energy of the system of all three charges.
 
flyonthewall said:
as shown in the figure,
The written description seems reasonably clear, but the diagram might be useful.
flyonthewall said:
while a third point charge with positive charge + Q3 is initially located a long distance away on the line joining - Qo and + Qo. An external force moves point charge +Q3 along the line until it is in its final position a distance D to the right of +Qo.
And so presumably 2D to the right of -Qo.
flyonthewall said:
Which of the following claims is true during the time that point charge + Q 3 is being moved from its initial position to its final position?

A) The work done by point charge +Qo on point charge +Q3 is positive.
B) The work done by the external force on point charge +Q3 is zero.
C) The electric potential energy of the (-Qo) (+Q3) system becomes higher.
D) The electric potential energy of the (-Qo)(+Q3) system becomes lower.
Relevant Equations: Ue = (kq1q2) / r

Here is my line of thinking:
I know A and B aren't correct since the work done would be negative since the electric force and displacement are in opposite directions.
For both A and B? B is not necessarily an electric force.
flyonthewall said:
When calculating the electric potential energies to consider options C and D, I thought the initial electric potential energy of the system was -(kQ^2)/D and the final electric potential energy was the sum of the three pairs of electric potential energy so it would be -(kQ^2)/d + (kQ^2)/d - (kQ^2)/2D which simplifies to -(kQ^2) / 2D.
You seem to be assuming all charges have magnitude Q. I read it that the third charge can have a different magnitude. But your main error is misreading the question. C and D refer to only -Qo and +Q3, not the three charge system.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top